How The ‘Wise’ Have Failed Humanity  

 

19“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.”   26For you see your calling, brethren, that not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called. 27But God has chosen the foolish things of the world to put to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to put to shame the things which are mighty; 28and the base things of the world and the things which are despised God has chosen, and the things which are not, to bring to nothing the things that are, 29that no flesh should glory in His presence. 30But of Him you are in Christ Jesus, who became for us wisdom from God—and righteousness and sanctification and redemption—31that, as it is written, “He who glories, let him glory in the Lord.” (1 Cor.1:19, 26-31).

 

Now what might the wisdom of this world have to do with global warming and climate change?  

For two and a half centuries, since the dawn of the ‘age of enlightenment’, the wise of this world have been telling us that humanity is on a never ending curve of evolutionary progress.  The laws of nature were supposed to propel humanity to ever greater degree of civilisation and sofistication, then all of a sudden, we discover that the same laws are leading humanity on a reverse course.  With astonishing speed, humanity came to the dreadful realisation that the future is no where near as bringht and promissing as our leading wise men would have us believe. 

How was it possible that the entire world was taken by surprise by such overwhelmingly bad news in less than half a dozen years?   Where were the wise men all this time, when those bad news were in the making? 

The signs were there for those who had eyes to see, for these things did not happen overnight.  For just as the leaders of the Soviet Union were blinded by their own fallacious ideology, and could not see the abyss towards which they were heading their people, the leaders of the western world were blinded by their own pyrhic success against the ‘evil empire’.  

Have a look at the following quote from The Christian Herald  No 2, which we published in 1992.  See the main concerns in the world at that tine, and how tiny they were compared with what we are facing now.    

 

“It is not a mere coincidence that at this particular juncture in world history, life is being threatened from several directions.  People who know little about biblical prophecies talk about the precarious condition of life on this planet.  This correlates well with the prophecies of Jesus Christ who foresaw a calamitous end for this world. 

Are we not living in those days now?  How much worse must things get before humanity realizes that it is heading towards catastrophe? The world has reached the saturation point as far as population is concerned.  The environment simply can no longer support the ever-increasing population.  It has been estimated that within a generation the world population will double, then in less than a century it will double again. It will then continue to double within an ever-reducing cycle.

One  scientist remarked that if the world survives to reach that level, life conditions would become so miserable that death would be preferable to life.  Well, for millions of people even now merciful death would be preferable to a hellish life.  For those dying of starvation and disease in Africa and elsewhere, the question of survival is no longer an option, but dying with dignity is.  A quicker death would be preferable to the slow, agonizing wasting they experience; all while watching their loved ones go through the same process.

About a decade ago, when images of starvation emerged from Africa, the world moved quickly to provide humanitarian aid.  Now many more millions are starving on a far wider scale, but few want to hear of it anymore.  Images of starvation on television screens draw only cursory looks these days.  Some television stations will not even broadcast such programs anymore.  They have become unpopular, they have lost their shocking value, and they no longer pull audiences. 

What would it be like when every country and every city in the world has doubled in size?  The environment is already dying.  Can the world support such an increase when many resources are already in short supply?  Can the world afford not to turn to God while He may still be found?  Perhaps it is already too late.

What were considered alarmist predictions a few decades ago, not only have been fulfilled, but exceeded many times over.  We are now learning about world problems that only a few years ago were unheard of.  A decade ago no one knew of AIDS.  Half a decade ago there was no talk of the thinning of the ozone layer.  These problems alone pose catastrophic dangers.  AIDS is threatening to destroy the regenerating power of many nations.  The thinning of the ozone layer is posing a threat to the vegetation and the microscopic marine organisms, the very support of life on earth, in addition to whatever harm they may do directly to human beings.  In February this year scientists raised the alarm when they discovered that the depletion of the ozone layer is much worse than previously thought:

 

"New finding of ozone depletion were so alarming, the scientists said, they decided to release them before completion of the data analysis in late March. “Everybody should be alarmed about this," said Michael Kurylo, a research manager at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).  "We're seeing conditions primed for ozone destruction.  It's in a far worse way than we thought." (Sydney Morning Herald, Feb. 5, 1992).

 

Apocalyptic times are well and truly upon us, yet people would not repent so that God may spare the world of these cataclysms. Can you see now why the sun is scorching the earth, and human beings suffer as a result? 

 

"And men were scorched with great heat, and they blasphemed the name of God who has power over these plagues; and they did not repent and give Him glory." (Rev.16:9).

 

Governments are unable to address these problems because they require painful solutions.  The people that elect them are more concerned with the pain of hunger than with restoring the ecological balance.  Difficult problems are often postponed and left for the next government to solve with the result that little is achieved.  Often they prefer not to raise such concerns in public at all.  Out of sight is out of mind.  No one realizes that these problems will get much worse and will not be solved unless and until people turn to God.

How many people remember the events of 1991?  Aside from the Gulf War and the ecological and social disasters that it created, how many know that in terms of natural disasters 1991 broke almost every record since record keeping began more than a century ago?

The US Congress allocates an annual percentage of its budget every year for emergency situations, to help those nations that suffer calamities and natural disasters. By May 1991, the sum allocated for the entire year was already exhausted.  There were droughts, famine, floods, earthquakes, volcanoes, tornadoes, mudslides, etc., too many to be listed.  Who remembers, for example, when approximately a third of China and nearly three quarters of Bangladesh were covered by floods?  Or the repeated volcanic eruptions in Japan and the Philippines that caused damage over huge areas?  Or the torrential rains in the heights of South America, where it seldom rains, that caused mudslides that covered entire communities?

 How many people know that large tracks of the USA and Australia, the breadbaskets of the world, suffered the worst droughts on record?  Preoccupation with the Gulf War and events in the former Soviet Union meant that most of these disasters passed unnoticed.  As Jesus Christ said: "For as in the days before the flood [of Noah] . . . when they did not know until the flood came and took them all away, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be" (Mat.24:38,39).  To compound the misery caused by natural disasters, were those caused by human folly.  The year began with the madness of the Gulf War, and finished with the collapse of that bastion of atheism, the Soviet Union. 

People believe that communism failed.  Communism never failed, atheism did!  Communism never failed because it has never been tried.  What they practiced in the Soviet Union and its satellite nations was not communism but a parody of it. It is a satanic ploy to undermine every good idea that comes from the Bible.  True communism will work in the Kingdom of God.

Soviet communism failed, but so has American capitalism.  Such is the vulgarity of capitalism that at a time when a company like General Motors is closing down dozens of factories and laying off thousands of people, it grants its retiring Chairman an annual pension of $US1.2 million.  The Chairman of Chrysler, who has an allocated salary of $4.5 millions, went to Japan with President Bush to lecture the Japanese on work ethics.  When it was pointed out to him that the Chairman of Toyota, a much more successful company, earns a fifth of his salary, he stormed out of the meeting and left Japan indignant.

No social conscience on the part of those who clamber their way to the top.  No Christian concern for one's fellow human beings from the leading citizens of the, supposedly, number one Christian nation on earth.  Has no one ever told these people that "it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God"? (Mat.19:24). Even at the retiring age they still do not think of the purpose of life and what lies beyond this temporary existence.

Where are the spiritual leaders of that nation?  What have they achieved?  Why are they silent in the face of such blatant greed and exploitation?  Or are they part of the same mentality?

The country wonders why its economy is faltering so badly.  Unfettered capitalism is just as unchristian as totalitarian communism.  Soviet communism has collapsed; now watch for the collapse of capitalism.  Those who believe that the USA will once again dominate the world as it used to, or that Great Britain will rule the waves as during the height of its empire, have some surprises coming their way.

This author grew up behind the “Iron Curtain” where a great part of his education involved indoctrination about the “glorious future the Soviet Union was leading the world into”.  It was a trial by fire that few people have known.  The communists justified destroying everything and everyone who opposed their march towards a God-less “utopia”, but instead of paradise, it became a Devil’s nightmare.

Out of that atheistic nightmare, God had to bring someone at enormous personal sacrifice to preach His Gospel to the world, because those who had it all the time made a mockery of it by turning it into a money making venture.

The Soviet Union collapsed into ashes leaving a cauldron of ethnic tensions and unfulfilled dreams that threaten to draw the world into the end-time catastrophic conflict.  The chaos left behind by that collapse is only now becoming apparent.  God alone knows what three hundred million people will do with their nuclear weapons when wide scale starvation takes place.  There are repeated warnings in the Bible that He will "bring disaster from the north and great destruction." 

At a time when the world is facing the test of survival, few people understand that there is a connection between current problems and the spiritual decline of the world.  Even the Churches of God, who once prided themselves in their ability to understand the prophecies of God, have fallen silent.  At the time that their input is needed more than ever, they are engaged in an internecine war that is sapping their strength from within.

Once again, as it has happened throughout history, God has raised people from the lowest levels of society to do His work.  The message that John the Baptist delivered to ancient Israel, prior to the coming of Jesus Christ, is now being delivered to the whole world, just in time for His glorious return to this earth. 

 

“1In those days John the Baptist came preaching in the wilderness of Judea2and saying, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand!” (Mat.3:1-2).  “9Now as they came down from the mountain, Jesus commanded them, saying, “Tell the vision to no one until the Son of Man is risen from the dead.”  10And His disciples asked Him, saying, “Why then do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?” 11Jesus answered and said to them, “Indeed, Elijah is coming first and will restore all things.” (Mat. 17:9-11).

 

          So repent, for the Kingdom of God is truly at hand.  Things are being restored before your very eyes.”

                                                                                                                                                      (The Christian Herald No 2, pp. 7-9).  

 

Incredibly prophetic, isn’t it?  We did not know then how capitalism would colapse, we just knew that it had to.  Unfortunately we now know that the entire world will colapse with it.  The world has entered an age of drastic changes which will affect every human being.  Nothing less than the very survival of life on this planet is at stake now.

It isn’t that there is no solution to the world’s problems; but that solution is no longer with human beings.  Only God Almighty, who knew from the beginning that humanity would come to this end, can save humanity now.  The problem is that human beings will not turn to Him to save themselves while He is still available. 

Make no mistake about it: there will come a time when even God will not be available anymore, and everyone will be sealed in the condition in which he is found at that time.  

 

“10And he said to me, “Do not seal the words of the prophecy of this book, for the time is at hand. 11He who is unjust, let him be unjust still; he who is filthy, let him be filthy still; he who is righteous, let him be righteous still; he who is holy, let him be holy still.”  12“And behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to every one according to his work. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last.” (Rev.22:10-13).

 

What are human beings to do in  the meantime?  This is what God is telling His people.     

 

15“See, I have set before you today life and good, death and evil, 16in that I command you today to love the Lord your God, to walk in His ways, and to keep His commandments, His statutes, and His judgments, that you may live and multiply; and the Lord your God will bless you in the land which you go to possess. 17But if your heart turns away so that you do not hear, and are drawn away, and worship other gods and serve them, 18I announce to you today that you shall surely perish; you shall not prolong your days in the land which you cross over the Jordan to go in and possess. 19I call heaven and earth as witnesses today against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing; therefore choose life, that both you and your descendants may live; 20that you may love the Lord your God, that you may obey His voice, and that you may cling to Him, for He is your life and the length of your days; and that you may dwell in the land which the Lord swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, to give them.” (Deut. 30:15-20).

 

I set before you life and death, blessing and cursing, therefore choose life, said God.  And what did they do?  They chose death and that is why they lost their mission, their nation, and themselves.  Ever since that time, they have been wanderers in the world.  Israel however, was to be an example to the world, therefore humanity has a similar choice now.  

 

“But I want to remind you, though you once knew this, that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe. 6And the angels who did not keep their proper domain, but left their own abode, He has reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day; 7as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them in a similar manner to these, having given themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.”(Jude 1:5-7)

 

It is not a mere coincidence that as the world has given itself to the same sins as Sodom and Gomorrah, it faces the same fate.  There has been a conspiracy between the wise of this world, who have led humanity away from God with their notion of evolution, and the spiritually wise who were supposed to uphold the truth of God and keep humanity on track.   

 

“1But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Lord who bought them, and bring on themselves swift destruction. 2And many will follow their destructive ways, because of whom the way of truth will be blasphemed. 3By covetousness they will exploit you with deceptive words; for a long time their judgment has not been idle, and their destruction does not slumber.   4For if God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment; 5and did not spare the ancient world, but saved Noah, one of eight people, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood on the world of the ungodly; 6and turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes, condemned them to destruction, making them an example to those who afterward would live ungodly.” (2 Peter 2:1-6).   

 

Why do human beings ‘follow destructive ways’, and not the ways of God? And why are those who preach the Word of God and the true Gospel of salvation being ignored and persecuted, while the purveyors of deadly gospels are being honoured and rewarded?  How did we know as early as 1992, when we published TCH No 2, that humanity had entered the age of troubles connected with the end time?  We knew it from the Bible, and from prophecies like the following one. 

 

4“But you, Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book until the time of the end; many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase.” . . .  9And he said, “Go your way, Daniel, for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. 10Many shall be purified, made white, and refined, but the wicked shall do wickedly; and none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand.” (Dan. 12:4, 9-10).

 

9“Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and kill you, and you will be hated by all nations for My name’s sake. 10And then many will be offended, will betray one another, and will hate one another. 11Then many false prophets will rise up and deceive many. 12And because lawlessness will abound, the love of many will grow cold. 13But he who endures to the end shall be saved.” (Mat. 24:9-13).

 

How wonderfully these prophecies reflect our time.  First they tell us that when these things happen it will be the time of the end.   ‘Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase.’   Isn’t this a reflection of our modern age when transport and knowledge are so widespread?  Then we are told that none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand.  Where are the wise that understand these things?  And if they understand them, why are human beings still in ignorance about their meaning? Why are they not turning to the only source that can save them from these impending catastrophes?  Because the wise of Daniel are different from the wise of Apostle Paul (quoted at the beginning of this article).   

The wise according to the knowledge of God understand what is happening in the world, whereas the wise according to the knowledge of this world are blindly leading humanity to perdition.   It is not a mere coincidence that as the world is being devastated by global warming and climate change, the spectre of nuclear annihilation has raised its ugly head again.

 

 

 

 



                 “Let go of Cold War mentality, US tells Putin”

 

“THE United States Defence Secretary, Robert Gates, has disputed a lengthy critique of American power by the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, telling a European security conference: "One Cold War was quite enough."  Mr Gates chose words of velvet, not steel, in offering Washington's fullest response to Mr Putin's long complaint on Saturday about US domination of global affairs.  "As an old Cold Warrior, one of yesterday's speeches almost filled me with nostalgia for a less-complex time," he said. "Almost."  Mr Gates, a former director of the CIA recently called back to government service from academia to serve as defence secretary, told attendees of the 43rd Munich Conference on Security Policy that both he and Mr Putin had spent most of their careers in their governments' spy agencies. "And, I guess, old spies have a habit of blunt speaking," Mr Gates said.

"However, I have been to re-education camp - spending 4½ years as a university president." His remark drew laughs and applause. His sharpest response to Putin was gently couched.  "Russia is a partner in endeavours," Mr Gates said.  "But we wonder, too, about some Russian policies that seem to work against international stability, such as its arms transfers and its temptation to use energy resources for political coercion."

Throughout the rebuttal, and in a longer discourse on how the US's European allies must help rebuild Afghanistan and remain engaged in the fight against terrorism, Mr Gates mentioned Mr Putin only once by name. That came when he said he had accepted an invitation from Mr Putin to visit Moscow.  Mr Gates cast himself as a geopolitical realist and drew a knowing laugh when he focused on Mr Putin's assertion that the US and its allies were dividing Europe. "All of these characterisations belong in the past," Mr Gates said. "The free world versus those behind the Iron Curtain. North versus South. East versus West. And I am told that some have even spoken in terms of old Europe versus new."   The US has asked Japan not to arrange a meeting between the Vice-President, Dick Cheney, and the Defence Minister, Fumio Kyuma, an apparent response to Mr Kyuma's criticism of US policy, Kyodo news agency reported.   Last month Mr Kyuma irked the US by saying it was wrong to start the war in Iraq. Mr Cheney is scheduled to meet the chief officers of Japan's Self-Defence Forces during a visit next week.  (Thom Shanker, The New York Times, Feb. 13, 2007).

 

While the US deals with velvet gloves with its Russian adversary, Putin makes incessant preparations to challenge America’s dominance of the world. 

 

Shanghai  Co-operation Organisation – ‘timely and visionary’  “THE Shanghai Co-operation Organisation, whose members and observers represent half the world's population, signalled at its annual summit yesterday its determination to play a central role in global energy politics.  Russian President Vladimir Putin urged the formation of "an SCO energy club" - because it involves some of the biggest energy exporters and importers.  The leaders of China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan also moved at the Shanghai meeting to develop the group into a powerful military and economic force.   They did not consider new members - instead asking the foreign ministers to draft new membership rules later - but expanded the role usually taken by observers. Those observers included Iran's controversial President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who invited the energy ministers of the SCO to meet in Iran "to explore more effective ways of co-operating in the exploration, exploitation, transport and conversion of energy".  The invitation is likely to be taken up, not least because Iran has become the third-biggest supplier of oil to China.

India, an SCO observer like Iran, Pakistan and Mongolia, has recently been a major competitor with China for energy.

It indicated a change in tack by sending its Petroleum and Gas Minister, Murli Deora, to the summit, and has decided to join China in bidding $2.7 billion together to develop oilfields in SCO member Kazakhstan.

In his address to the summit, Mr Ahmadinejad commended steps "to turn the SCO into a strong, influential institution" with the capacity to "throw out the threats of domineering powers to interfere in the affairs of other states" - an apparent reference to the US. He called for more educational and cultural exchanges within the region.  Yesterday's meeting involving the leaders of Iran, Russia and China at the SCO underlines perceptions of a growing division within the UN Security Council - of which Russia and China are members - over US and European efforts to pressure Iran over its nuclear ambitions.

Mr Putin told his Iranian counterpart after the summit that he wanted to discuss a European proposal for Iran to relinquish its nuclear fuel enrichment program, while also stressing Russia's long-standing diplomatic support for Iran.

"Russia has always been a reliable partner," he told Mr Ahmadinejad, who responded by saying: "Our positions are clear and very close to one another."  China's President Hu Jintao celebrated the growth in reach of the SCO in its five years' existence, which he attributed to the "Shanghai spirit" - which involves developing a "new silk road" encompassing Confucian, Islamic, Slavic and Hindu cultures, while protecting the leaders' capacity to rule their way without outside interference.

[Notice, ‘Slavic’ not Christian. While the other cultures are designated by their religion, the Slavic one is not].

Illustrating this spirit, the presidents appeared at a press conference, giving speeches but not allowing questions.

The leaders signed 10 agreements that sought to institutionalise growing collaboration, ranging from banking to education to economic collaboration, with China offering $1.2 billion soft loans to buy Chinese goods.

Mr Hu urged the members to "strengthen strategic co-operation" against the "three evils" - separatism, terrorism and extremism - including through intelligence exchange and communication.   He proposed a non-aggression treaty between SCO members and said he hoped the international community would "respect the social systems independently chosen by our members and observers and the foreign policy chosen by them".   And he urged "an even broader future for the SCO".  Mr Putin described the organisation's establishment as "timely and visionary", stressing the need to bring young people from the region together.  (Rowan Callick, The Australian, June 16, 2006).

 

Did you notice how many members this ‘timely and visionary’ organisation has?  Ten – all of them avowed anti-Israeli: Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Mongolia, Iran, Pakistan, and India.  Some are mere observers at this stage, but make no mistake about it, they all see the advantage of belonging to an organisation that holds most of the world’s energy resources at a time when these are fast becoming a precious commodity. 

Is this the ten-nation ‘beast’ that Russia is prophesied to lead against Israel and the western world in the end time?  No one will know for sure until that happens, but since other signs point to the fact that we are on the very brink of that awesome event, there is every likelihood that this would be it.

 

 

                “Trilateral Forum to Counter America 

 

“The Foreign Ministers of India, Russia and China got together for a high profile trilateral meeting in New Delhi on Wednesday.  The initiative, which will be useful for coordinating their efforts in the international arena, is being closely watched around the world.  It's a forum, which all three sides are using to strengthen their political and economic influence but many also see it as a bloc to counter America's influence.  Interestingly, the meeting came only days after President Putin's outburst against Washington. He accused the US of fuelling a nuclear arms race and undermining international institutions.  Pranab Mukherjee, China's Li Zhaoxing and Russia's Sergei Ivanov discussed various global issues at the meet.  Even though New Delhi denied the forum has been created against any third country, in the joint statement there was an indirect criticism of US policy and a thrust on multilateralism.   The joint communiqué talks of the democratisation of international relations and in an indirect criticism of the war in Iraq. It also calls for respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all nations.  Russia in particular has been vocal about a multi-polar world and saw this forum as a way to strengthen that.  "We are united in the view that it's necessary to develop multilateral democracy and strengthen the UN's role," said Sergei Lavrov, Foreign Minister, Russia.  This was the second stand-alone meeting between the three countries after Russian city of Vladivostok two years back.  Foreign Ministers of the three countries have earlier met four times on the sidelines of some international events, including twice on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York.  The next meting of the big three will be held in China.” (Nidhi Razdan, New Delhi, AFP, Yahoo, NDTV – Feb 14, 2007)

Ever since it came to power, the Bush administration has been telling the world that it is in friendly terms with Russia, a compliment that Putin and his administration have never returned.  On the contrary, Putin is on record as saying that the Cold War is back on the agenda. Because of that he has embarked upon a massive program of upgrading his military machine on the one hand, and in creating a counterbalancing organisation to America’s power on the other.

How many people have heard of the Shangahai Co-operation Organisation?  Not many people for sure, because western media has either ignored it, or said very little about it. Yet this is the ‘timely and visionary’ organisation that Putin is incessantly cultivating to counter America.  

And there is another reason why this organisation has received so little attention.  While we have been saying that Russia will be a main player in the end time Great Tribulation, our nemesis has filled the world with the notion that Germany would be the country to lead a ten-nation alliance against Israel.  Consequently, the world is looking in the wrong direction to see those prophecies fulfilled.     

It is not a mere coincidence either that at this particular junction in world history, when biblical prophecies tell us to expect major world developments, that drought is devastating the world on an unprecedented scale.  And yet, there are still skeptics who say that, in spite of all the evidence to the contrary, all these changes are within normal climate variations. 

 

““Big dry’s natural, not due to climate change says researcher Barrie Hunt, former leader of the CSIRO’s climate modelling program.  “The drought gripping southeast Australia is due to natural variations in climate rather than the greenhouse effect. The finding, based on CSIRO research, undermines claims – made by South Australian Premier Mike Rann at a water summit in Canberra last month that Australia is in the grip of one-in-1000-yeats drought.  

“It is very, very highly likely that what we are seeing at the moment is natural climatic variability,”  researcher Barrie Hunt has told The Australian, saying the CSIRO’s model of 10,000 years of natural climate variability put current drought into perspective.  “When people talk about it as a 1000-year drought, they haven’t got the information.  They don’t understand that according to natural variability we could get another one in 50 years or it might be another 800 years, and there’s no way of predicting it”   The CSIRO’s global climate model incorporates measurements of air pressure, temperature and wind at different levels of the atmosphere, sea surface temperatures and rainfall.    . . .

 Mr Hunt said the onset, duration and termination of the long dries could not be predicted because they were due to random processes.  He said the current drought was an example of a dry sequence that began with an El Nino.  

“It starts a drought and you get sea-surface temperatures flickering backwards and forwards a bit.  The rainfall may go back to fairly near normal but it is still below average, and then you get another El Niño,” he said 

“This can go on for a decade.  Eventually it breaks.  You don’t know why, it is random thing.  This is just part of the beauty of the climatic system.   (Asa Wahlquist, The Australian, 28-12-2006)

 

See how wise and visionary this climate scientist is?  The drought gripping southeast Australia, he says, is due to natural variations in the climate rather than the greenhouse effect”.  In so doing, he goes against the views of many other scientists, even of politicians who are notoriously slow in taking note of matters that are beyond their immediate concern.

 

“Drought to "get dramatically worse"  The states will receive an extra $500 million for water-saving initiatives after Treasurer Peter Costello declared the drought was about to "get dramatically worse".  In an interview with The Sunday Telegraph, Mr Costello said he will spend part of next month working on ideas for water policy, even though Malcolm Turnbull is the Government's spokesman for the area.   "This is going to be a long-term issue. There's a lot of work to be done in water, and it's got to be done well because it's so important. Water is going to be a big focus of next year.''  . . .   "All of our capital cities are under water restrictions and if it doesn't rain next year then the situation is going to get dramatically worse,'' Mr Costello said.   (Lincoln Wright, The Daily Telegraph, 24-12-2006)

 

Barrie Hunt says that when people talk about the current drought as “a 1000-year event”, they haven’t got the information. The CSIRO, he tells us, has a global model which incorporates measurements of air pressure, temperature, wind, and sea surface temperature. Could it be that other people have their own model of climate change too? 

He speaks of the drought in southeast Australia, when in fact the whole country is affected by it.    

All of Australia’s capital cities, not to speak of its smaller inland cities and towns are running out of drinking water.  Sydney, Australia’s largest city and its economic hub, has only about a year of water left in its dams.

 

“Thinking Global and Voting Local”  For the first time, climate change is set to take centre stage in the coming state and federel election campaigns.  Not too long ago, global warming was something debated about in science journals and university lecture halls.  When former NSW premier Bob Car began banging on about the melting of the ice caps back in 2003, he was lambasted for taking his eye off the affairs of the state.  But with the release of the Stern report, the screening of the Al Gore movie An Inconvenient Truth together with some plain old weird weather, global warming together with future energy and water supplies is now registering in the public conscience.  An exclusive Galaxy poll undertaken for The Sunday Telegraph last month found global warming was rated by NSW residents as the No. 1 issue which could threaten the quality of life in Australia. . .  The fact that Sydney is on the verge of running out of drinking water has helped elevate the issue in a community facing the prospect of permanent water restrictions and possible future rationing.   Recent figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics estimated NSW had around 1 and 1/2 years of water left in its major dams. (The Sunday Telegraph, Dec. 31, 2006).

 

How extraordinary that a statement made by the Premier of NSW in 2003, less than four years ago, about gobal warming, should be regarded as so far back in time.  And where did he get that information from? He did not say, but we have kept him, and other State Premiers, informed of what is happening in the world. 

 

“Man is cooking the planet”  “SCIENTISTS have now found the connection between man-made carbon emissions and global warming, proving once and for all that human activity is changing the world.

And scientists have debunked the myth that global warming is simply a global cycle, saying that according to its cycle the earth should be in a period of cooling, not warming.   The stunning find is to be released in the final report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in Paris on Friday, the biggest undertaking yet on the earth's changing climate.  A leaked draft copy has detailed the main thrusts of the findings and leaves no doubt the effect mankind is having on the planet.  Every inhabited continent on earth is affected, with different parts of the world visibly responding to human activity, such as the melting of ice caps.

For the past six years 2,000 of the world's leading climate scientists - climatologists, glaciologists, meterologists, oceanographers and other specialists, have studied all known scientific literature on climate change, with the findings to be released Friday.   In all, three reports making up the fourth assessment of the IPCC will be published this year, in full, with Friday's publication being the first.  "It is highly likely (greater than 95 per cent probability) that the warming observed during the past half century cannot be explained without external forcing (human activity),'' the draft says.  And while the naysayers might dismiss the findings as a conspirational hoax, as some would have you believe, the IPCC is traditionally regarded as being conservative, with a preference for erring on the side of caution.

"Confidence in the assessment of the human contributions to recent climate change has increased considerably since the TAR (Third Assessment Report),'' the draft says.  This confidence is based on longer and more detailed records and observations available to the scientists.  Given this, its assessment could not be more damning. Among the findings are:

- 11 of the earth's 12 warmest years since 1850 have occured since 1995.

- Indications are the earth's temperature will rise three degrees celsius by 2100, with a possibility it could be as high as six degrees. This could be catastrophic, with a similar temperature shift marking the last ice age 12,000 years ago.

- It is virtually certain (99 per cent probability) that carbon dioxide levels and global warming is far above the range naturally varying in the atmosphere over the past 650,000 years. 

- It is virtually certain that human activity has played the dominant role in this. 

- It is likely that human activity is responsible for other observed changes to the earth such as ocean warming and melting of the Arctic sea ice.   The IPCC report revealed climate change could be far worse than previously thought.

This risk is mainly because of potentially disastrous "positive'' feedbacks which could accelerate rising temperatures.

In other words, because the world is warming, increasing evaporation from the oceans has caused atmospheric concentrations of water vapour over the sea - by 4 per cent since 1970.

This increased water vapour is a powerful greenhouse agent, and exacerbates the greenhouse effect.

However it is not all doom and gloom, with the report saying there are many "positive feedbacks''.

As for claims that this global warming is simply part of the earth's natural thermal cycle, the report says: "These changes took place at a time when non-anthropogenic forcing factors (ie, the sum of solar and volcanic forcing) would be expected to have produced cooling, not warming.   "There is increased confidence that natural internal variability cannot account for the observed changes, due in part to improved studies demonstrating that the warming occurred in both oceans and atmosphere, together with observed ice mass losses.'' (Paul Kent, The Sunday Telegraph, 30 Jan. 2007).

 

“Vast ice shelf collapses in the Arctic”  “A vast ice shelf in the Canadian Arctic has broken up, a further sign of the astonishing rate at which polar ice is now melting because of global warming.   The Ayles ice shelf, more than 40 square miles in extent - over five times the size of central London - has broken clear from the coast of Ellesmere Island, about 500 miles south of the North Pole in the Canadian Arctic, it emerged yesterday.   The broken shelf has formed an ice island, in what a leading scientist described as a "dramatic and disturbing event", citing climate change as the cause. The news caps a dramatic year of discovery about just how quickly the polar ice is disappearing.  It comes as America's leading climate scientist, James Hansen, warns in today's Independent that the Earth is being turned into "a different planet" because of the continuing increase in man-made emissions of greenhouse gases.  The break-up of the Ayles shelf occurred 16 months ago, in an area so remote it was not at first detected. "This is a dramatic and disturbing event," said Professor Warwick Vincent of Laval University in Quebec City. "It shows that we are losing remarkable features of the Canadian North that have been in place for many thousands of years.” Ice shelves float on the sea, but are connected to land (as opposed to ice sheets, which are wholly land-based). In the past five years, several ice shelves along the fringes of the Antarctic peninsula have started to become unstable or break up. The most spectacular was the 2002 collapse of the Larsen B ice shelf, the size of Luxembourg.   Until now, there had not been a similar event among the six major shelves remaining in Canada's Arctic, which are packed with ancient ice that is more than 3,000 years old.

Professor Vincent, who studies Arctic ecosystems, travelled to the newly formed ice island and was amazed at what he saw. "It's like a cruise missile has come down and hit the ice shelf," he said. "Unusually warm temperatures definitely played a major role. It is consistent with climate change." The collapse was picked up by the Canadian Ice Service, which notified Luke Copland, head of the new global ice laboratory at the University of Ottawa. Using US and Canadian satellite images, as well as seismic data - the event registered on earthquake monitors more than 150 miles away - Professor Copland discovered that the ice shelf collapsed in the early afternoon of 13 August 2005. Scientists were surprised at the speed of the event, Professor Copland said - it took less than an hour.  There have already been several disturbing indications this year that the Arctic ice is melting at a much faster rate than expected. In September, two NASA reports showed a great surge in the disappearance of the winter sea ice over the past two years, with an area the size of Turkey disappearing in 12 months.”  (Michael McCarthy, Environment Editor, The Independent, 29-12-2006).

 

 

                          “A planet on the edge”

 

“They cling precariously to the top of what is left of the ice floe, their fragile grip the perfect symbol of the tragedy of global warming.  Captured on film by Canadian environmentalists , the pair of polar bears look stranded on chunks of broken ice.  Although the magnificent creatures are well adapted to the water, and can swim many kilometres to solid land, the distance is getting ever greater as the Arctic ice diminishes.    Scientists have observed that in the struggle for survival, the bears – and females especially – are now much thinner.  Scientists believe that four bears which recently drowned off the coast of Alasca had simply been unable to cope with a violent Arctic storm.

The plight of the bears was higghlighted as the prospect of a gloomy future emerged from leaks of the most comprehensive report into global warming yet undertaken.  Concluding that it is “highly likely” that mankind is to blame for climate change, it talks of more droughts, torrential rains, shrinking Arctic ice and glaciers, and raising sea levels for at least the next century. And it warns that the effect of a build-up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere will last far longer.”  

The report, from the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, draws on the work of 2500 researchers from more than 130 nations and is the most comprehensive overview of climate change for policy-makers.   It claims that global warming is “very likely” caused by human activity.    Two participants, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that the group approved the term “very likely” in previous sessions.  That means they agree that there is a 90 per cent chance that global warming is caused by human activity.  The last report, in 2001, said global warming was “likely” caused by humans.  There had been speculation that the participants might try to change the wording this time to “virtually certain” – which means a 99 per cent chance.  The report is considered an authoritative document that could influence governmental and industrial policy worldwide.”  (Bill  Mouland, Sunday Telegraph, Feb. 04, 2007).

 

These are the sort of things that nightmares are made of – “the astonishing rate at which polar ice is now melting because of global warming” – except that these are for real.  And what does the leading CSRIO scientist say about that?  That ‘this is just part of the beauty of the climatic system.”   For those who do not know what CSRIO stands for it is, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.

In 1982, I was travelling through NSW to take up a position in a country town.  I did not expect to find green lush vegetation European style, but neither did I expect to find wanton devastation on a scale that staggered me.   There are places where you could see the horizon in either direction and not see a tree in sight.  In one particular case, there is a 90 kilometres stretch of highway without a tree in sight.  And that is not the area marked as desert on the map, but the nation’s prime agricultural land.  In order to maximise their profit, they have deforested the land and left it totally bare. And who has been guiding the nation’s farmers in their endeavours?  The cream of wise men from the nation’s elite institution – the CSRIO.  A decade later, when we published The Christian Herald No 3, we said that that policy would lead to disaster.  That disaster came sooner than expected.  With minor interruptions, drought has gripped the country ever since.

To be fair, not all CSRIO scientists think that this is “just part of the beauty of the climatic system.” 

 

 Scientist's warning: carbon dioxide eating the planet”  The global level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has alarmed scientists by growing strongly for the last four years in a row.  "That's unprecedented," said Paul Fraser, chief research scientist at the CSIRO's Marine and Atmospheric Research division.  Describing the trend as "a clear manifestation" of the world's increasing hunger for fossil fuels, Dr Fraser said: "We are in line for the carbon dioxide future that we hope to avoid, a one-to-three degree rise in temperatures over the next century."

Last year carbon dioxide levels grew by two parts per million, or 0.54 per cent, twice the rate of the early 1980s. Atmospheric nitrous oxide, produced by fertilisers and land clearing, also soared last year, rising one part per billion, or 0.3 per cent.  And artificial greenhouse gases, including hydrofluoro-carbons, introduced during the 1990s to replace chlorofluorocarbons, set a growth record, up seven parts per trillion, a 5.3 per cent increase.

The CSIRO said 2005 "was a record for increases in green-house gas heating, the main driver of increasing surface temperatures". Dr Fraser said that with carbon dioxide emissions, "normally we have one or two years of high growth, followed by one or two years of lower growth". This comes from the oceans and the biosphere - including trees and plants - soaking up enough of the gas to take the edge off increases.  However, sampling by the Bureau of Meteorology in Tasmania showed the normal pattern of higher and lower growth rates, called modulation, had failed to appear in the last four years. Instead, annual carbon dioxide increases had been consistently above average. "That's a surprise," said Dr Fraser, adding it would be extraordinary if the modulating effect of the oceans and the biosphere failed to kick in this year. However, the environment's ability to absorb the gas could eventually be overwhelmed. The only solution was "emitting less carbon dioxide", he said.  Options included switching to solar, wind, nuclear, hydro or hydrogen power. Dr Fraser, who will present the findings at this week's CSIRO climate meeting in Sydney, said it was for politicians to choose which option, or options, should be adopted. "As scientists, we have to keep putting the facts up."

His good news was that methane - "the second most important gas responsible for the enhanced greenhouse effect" - had not grown for six years. The decline resulted from industry, particularly mining, reducing leaks. And ozone damaging gases declined again last year, continuing a trend that began in 1997.” (Richard Macey, The Daily Telegraph, May 16, 2006)

 

Use of harmful fertilisers and land clearing, largely responsible for Australia’s current crisis, continue unabated to the present day.  Should we be surprised then that 2005 was a record year for increases in green-house emissions? 

Now what happened to that much hyped about Kyoto protocol?  So much has been said and written about it, many people thought that it would be the saviour of the world, if only everybody signed it and conformed to its objectives.

And what did we say about it at that time?  That it would not make an iota of difference to the warming of the planet.   

Scientists now acknowledge that even if all gas emissions were reduced to zero, which is impossible, not just to the 1990 levels as that protocol demands, the planet would still continue to heat up for several more decades.  

 

“All nations must accept responsibility for the heating of the planet – and the consequences, says Dr Neville Nicholas of the School of Geography and Environmental Science at Monash University.  When asked, “If all the world’s gas-generating power stations were turned off tomorrow, how long would it take before it affected global warming,” he replied:  Carbon dioxide remains in the atmosphere for a long time, so warming would continue for several decades, even if we stopped all activities creating greenhouse gases.  But the rate of warming would definitely slow down.”  (Sunday Telegraph, 7 Jan. 2006).  

 

 

 

                  “Unholy trinity – climate change, water shortage,

               and the peaking of oil supply -  set to drag us into the abyss” 

 

We are about to experience the convergence of three of the great issues confronting humanity. Climate change, the peaking of oil supply and water shortage are coming together in a manner which will profoundly alter our way of life, our institutions and our ability to prosper on this planet. Each is a major issue, but their convergence has received minimal attention.

“Population is the main driver. In the 60 years since World War II, the world population has grown at an unprecedented rate, from 2.5 billion to 6.5billion today, with 9 billion forecast by 2050 [That is a highly optimistic underestimate. For if in 60 years the world’s population had almost trippled, why should it grow by only a third in the next 50 years?  Ed.] 

“That growth has triggered insatiable demand for natural resources, notably water, oil and other fossil fuels. Exponential economic growth in a finite world hitting physical limits is not a new idea; we have experienced limits at a local level, but we have either side-stepped them or found short-term solutions, becoming overly confident that any global limits could be similarly circumvented.  Today, just as the bulk of the world's population is about to step on to the growth escalator, global limits emerge that are real and imminent. The weight of scientific evidence points to the fact the globe cannot support its present population, let alone an additional 2.5 billion, unless we embrace change.

“Climate change, peak oil, water shortage and population are contributing to a "tragedy of the commons", whereby free access and unrestricted demand for a finite resource doom the resource through over-exploitation. The benefits of exploitation accrue to individuals, whereas the costs are borne by all.  “Examples at local level abound, include overfishing and interrupting river flows for farming and irrigation. One mark of a mature society is that equitable solutions are found to the "commons" dilemma, and we have been relatively successful in doing this at local level. However as these issues become national and global, solutions become harder. For climate change, peak oil and water, the ultimate "commons" is the earth's atmosphere which we have been using as a garbage dump for carbon and other emissions.  As Aristotle said: "What is common to the greatest number has the least care bestowed upon it. Everyone thinks chiefly of his own, hardly at all of the common interest." In an underpopulated world this may not matter, but in our overpopulated world it is disastrous.

“Solutions require that we move beyond narrow national self-interest, take a global view and place our society and economy on a genuinely sustainable footing. Sustainability, "meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs", encompasses the entire basis upon which global society operates, not just the environment. It requires realigning our ethical framework, moving away from the winner-take-all individualism which has created so many of the "commons" problems, to a more co-operative individualism, where managing the global and local "commons" is paramount.   “Rather than the negative, focusing on supposed job cuts and fear of change, we should focus on the positive: we have a unique opportunity to set humanity on a new course, built around an ethical renaissance and sustainable societies. Undoubtedly there will be pain in the short term as conventional politics, economics and business models are turned on their head. However, the tools and technologies to solve these problems are available, the cost is less than we have been led to believe, and the benefits greater. Further, change can be achieved rapidly given the right impetus.

“Historically, this has rarely happened without a crisis. Fortunately the trinity are about to trigger that crisis with a prolonged period of "creative destruction" which will radically transform society and economy whether we like it or not. Our stark choice is either to embrace the tipping point bearing down upon us, seizing the opportunity to build a sustainable future, or fudge the issue, try to muddle through in the time-honoured manner and increasingly lose the ability to control our own affairs.  For Australia, along with many other countries, water is the priority. Resolving the water crisis will be the first test of whether we can combine long-term vision and principled leadership with the need to take the hard decisions quickly enough to stave off impending disaster. If so, it will stand us in good stead to tackle the even greater tasks ahead.”  (Ian Dunlop, former oil, gas and coal industry executive,  Sydney Morning Herald, 16 Oct. 2006).

 

 “Frightening reality we face”  “SYDNEY is looming as one of the world's major climate change casualties, with temperatures expected to soar 50 per cent higher than the average rise forecast for the entire planet.

For the first time, Australian scientists have charted in detail the impacts on the nation's largest metropolis of man's insatiable demand for energy and burning of fossil fuels.  The Daily Telegraph today exclusively reveals the landmark CSIRO report commissioned by the State Government which - for the first time - specifically details the impact of climate change on NSW.   It paints a picture of a city baking under average temperatures almost 5C higher than now - which will kill 1300 people a year - and one battered by extreme winds and permanent drought.  NSW Premier Morris Iemma said the report's findings were alarming.   "This might sound like a doomsday scenario, but it is one we must confront,'' Mr Iemma said . . .  "I do not want my kids to ask me in 10 years time why I didn't do more to address the issue of climate change.''

The CSIRO report warned that the city must work out how to adapt quickly, with the impacts of human-caused global warming now apparently inevitable.  "The future climate of Sydney is likely to be warmer and drier,'' the report says. "Such trends would also increase evaporation, heat waves, extreme winds and fire risk.   "Nevertheless, despite this trend towards drier conditions, the possibility of increases in extreme rainfall events remain.  "Although average changes in temperature, rainfall and evaporation will have long-term consequences for the catchment, the impacts of climate change are more likely to be felt through extreme weather events.''   Climate change forecasts for the coastal zone put Narrabeen and Collaroy on the hot zone for storm- inspired sea surges of about 22m - which would inundate homes.   Freak surges of 110m would be catastrophic.   "Such increases in storm surge in conjunction with sea level rises, would increase the risk of coastal inundation,'' the CSIRO says.” (Simon Benson, The Sunday Telegraph, Jan. 31, 2007).

 

“After 10 years, the dithering has to stop”  The threat posed by global warming is not as bad as we thought. It is considerably worse. This dire new assessment from the world's foremost authority, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, predicts temperatures could rise by as much as 6.4 degrees by 2100 and the seas with them. But long before this occurs, vulnerable regions such as Australia will face water crises, ravaged agricultural production and a huge loss of biodiversity - specifically, the death of the Great Barrier Reef, the loss of fragile alpine ecosystems and irretrievable damage to the Kakadu wetlands.

For the first time in the history, the 2500 eminent scientific opinions distilled in the UN report conclude it is "very likely" human activity has caused global warming and has as a result triggered a deadly rash of extreme weather events. No matter what humankind does now, the impact of climate change will be felt for hundreds of years; once the poison is in the system, nothing can be done to stop it working its way through. . .”   (Editorial, SMH, Feb. 5, 2007).

 

 

                  “Plenty more fish in the sea? Don't bet on it” 

 

Closely linked with the problem of overpopulation, is of course the supply of food for the world’s teeming masses. 

We know that famines are caused by droughts, but few people envission a famine caused by a scarcity of seafood.  One third of the world’s population depends on marine food, yet this is what is happening in the world’s seas at present.

 

Enjoy those seafood meals now, because by 2050 there may be no fish, prawns, crabs or other wild sea creatures left to eat.  Marine species are disappearing at an accelerating rate, posing a serious threat to human health and wellbeing, a four-year study of the state of the world's oceans has concluded.

Boris Worm, of Dalhousie University in Canada, said his team's research showed 29 per cent of seafood species currently fished had already collapsed, with catches having declined by at least 90 per cent.  "If the long-term trend continues, all fish and seafood species are projected to collapse within my lifetime - by 2048," Professor Worm said.  Loss of biodiversity also reduced the ocean's ability to resist diseases, filter out pollutants and cope with climate change, the study concluded.

"Whether we looked at tide pools or studies over the entire world's oceans, we saw the same picture emerging. In losing species we lose the productivity and stability of entire ecosystems," Professor Worm said.  "I was shocked and disturbed by how consistent these trends are - beyond anything we suspected."  However, the good news was that biodiversity could recover quickly if protected marine areas were established.  "The data show us it's not too late. We can turn this around."

“A large team of international scientists and economists was involved in the study, which is published in the journal Science.  They analysed commercial catches between 1950 and 2003 for 64 areas using the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation's database of fish and invertebrate species.  “Fisheries were found to be collapsing at a faster rate in ecosystems with fewer species. Fishery records and sediment cores for the past 1000 years at 12 coastal regions around the world, including Brisbane's Moreton Bay, were also examined.  “Steve Palumbi, of Stanford University, a member of the team, said loss of marine biodiversity made coastal regions more vulnerable to disease outbreaks and invasive species and reduced the areas suitable as nurseries.  "The ocean is a great recycler. It takes sewage and recycles it into nutrients. It scrubs toxins out of water and it turns carbon dioxide into food and oxygen."  To carry out this service for the people who lived along the coast, the waters needed their full complement of plants and animals, Professor Palumbi said.

“Professor Worm said under 1 per cent of the oceans were protected but the studies they analysed from 48 protected marine areas showed ecosystems could recover quickly.  "In many cases species come back more quickly than people anticipated - in three to five to 10 years. And where this has been done we see immediate economic benefits."

“Ed Barbier, of the University of Wyoming, said preservation of marine biodiversity involved short-term costs, but "over the long term, biodiversity conservation and economic development are complementary goals". (Deborah Smith, Science Editor, SMH, Nov 3, 2006).

 

Yes, marine ecosystems would recover quickly if protected, but will they?  Australia has been desperately trying to prevent the long nets of the Asian boats from sweeping the ocean floor, an extremely damaging practice to marine ecosystems, but without much success.  What these scientific reports do not tell us is that the krill, which is the basic source of food for many of the marine species, has decreased by 80 per cent in the last thirty years.  This is another reason, beside overfishing, that so many of the world’s fisheries have colapsed. 

Ian Dunlop said that, “Given the dominance of short-term pragmatism in our political and corporate cultures, it is likely our leaders will continue to procrastinate and not rise to the challenge.”  Exactly what we’ve been saying for years.   “The pressure for change,” he continued, “must come from the community at large”.  Hmmm! I wouldn’t bet on that either. When people scrounge for a living, they haven’t got much time for the environment.   A "tipping point will force a fundamental realignment of political and corporate attitudes,” he says.  Well, we hope so, but we doubt that too.  That is because change has occured so fast in the world, it has passed human ability to stop it, let alone reverse it. 

 

 

 

                  “Keeping a cool head amid warming hysteria”?

Global warming doomsayers were out and about in a big way recently, but the rain came in central Queensland, then here in Sydney.   January was also unusually cool. 

We have been subjected to a lot of nonsense about climate disasters, as some zealots have been presenting extreme scenarios to frighten us . . .  What we were seeing from the doomsayers was an induced dose of mild hysteria – semi-religious if you like, but dangerously close to superstition. . .   Scaremongers have used temperature fluctuations over a limited period and in a few places to misrepresent longer patterns.  Warming evidence is mixed and often exagerated but can be reasurring.  Global warming has been increasing constantly since 1975 at the rate of less than one-fifth of a degree Celsius per decade. . .  Britain’s University of East Anglia climate research unit found global temperatures did not rise between 1998 and 2005, and a NASA satelite recently found the southern hemisphere had not warmed in the past 25 years.” (The Sunday Telegraph, Feb. 18, 2007).

 

This article was written by none other than the head of the Catholic Church in Australia, Cardinal George Pell.  

He must have done a lot of research to find sources that conform with his views of humanity – that there is no global warming or major climate change to worry about.  He gave as suporting evidence the rain that fell in central Queensland and in Sydney.  And what was the effect of that rain?  The following article was in the same edition of The Sunday Telegraph.

 

 “Only 2 per cent of NSW not in drought”  NINETY-eight per cent of NSW is either in drought on on the brink of drought, up three per cent from December, NSW Government data shows.  The latest figures for January show 96.3 per cent of the state is drought declared, up from 93.2 per cent in the previous month, while the area in marginal territory is 1.7 per cent, Primary Industries Minister Ian Macdonald said today. Only two per cent of the state, in the Grafton and Lismore regions in the far north of NSW, is experiencing satisfactory conditions.  Rainfall since January is unlikely to have any significant impact on these figures.  "While weekend rainfall was well received in isolated parts of the state, the vast majority of farmers continue to face tough, dry conditions,'' he said.  At the end of January water storage levels across the state were at just 14.7 per cent of capacity, down 5.7 per cent from December.  "We desperately need more than 100 millimetres of soaking rain in the next few weeks,'' Mr Macdonald said. He said follow up rainfall was then needed to enable winter crop planting to occur in autumn and pasture growth for badly needed stock feed.” (Sunday Telegraph, Feb. 17, 2007). 

 

So in spite of the rain that fell in January, the drought afected area of NSW grew from 93.2 per cent to 96.3 per cent.  And the Sydney dam water, which was at a critival level before, grew by only three per cent and it is still at a critical level.    

Now does it mean that if widespread rain comes, as it will one day, there is no climate change and no global warming?

Cardinal Pell says that he feels reasured that global temperature has increased by only one-fifth of a degree Celsius per decade since 1975.  What he does not know is that a two degree increase in ocean temperatures would wipe out coral reefs around the world.  Much of Australia’s coral reef has already been bleached because of increse in the water temperature.  

He says that “Britain’s University of East Anglia climate research unit found global temperatures did not rise between 1998 and 2005, and a NASA satelite recently found the southern hemisphere had not warmed in the past 25 years.”  

We do not know whether East Anglia University is a Catholic one, but their figures are absolutely wrong.  Eleven of the hottest years on record have ocured in the last twelve years.  And this year is shaping up as the hottest year yet.  

As for that NASA report, where is it? We would like to see it.  It is un-professional to speak about a report and not quote it or give its reference. It is unforgiveable to misrepresent an institution. This is what a study by NASA concluded.

 

“North Pole Melting Into Sea”   “ICE is melting so fast in the Arctic that the North Pole will be in the open sea within 30 years. . .  The researchers, funded by NASA, said the ice retreat was likely to remain constant until 2024, when the process suddenly quicken.   In 30 to 50 years, they concluded, summer sea-ice would have vanished from almost the entire Arctic region.  But their forecast may already be out of date, says Chri Rapley, head of the British Antarctic Survey.  He said a recent study suggested emissions were rising more than twice as fast as in 2000, and this was likely to speed up ice loss even further. “The study may be an underestimate of when the Artctic summer ice might be all gone,” he said.  During the past 25 years, Arctic ice has been reduced by 25 per cent. Scientists have long known that ice reflects heat, and as the quantity reduces so does the amount of heat that can be bounced away from the Earth.  However, the study team from the National Centre for Atmospheric Research in Colorado, and two US universities, idenntified warmer ocean currents as an additional factor.  Disappearing ice is already causing problems for polar bears. Other wildlife, including seals, are also likely to suffer.  “We have already witnessed major losses in sea ice, but our research suggests the decrease over the next few decades could be far more dramatic than anything that has happened so far,” said Marica Holland, who led the polar warming study.” (The Australian, Dec. 13, 2006).        

 

Isn’t it an insult to honest reputable scientists who have put their career on line to prove to the world that global warming is far more serious than previously realised, to say that they are doomsayers and scaremongers?   Cardinal Pell could have known the truth if he wanted to, for this is what the same newspaper published two weeks before his article appeared.        

 

“State of Despair, Climate report says NSW will be a disaster zone”

“NSW is in grave danger of becoming a state where thousands die from heatwaves, rivers dry up and snow disappears from alpine regions, a new report warns.  A detailed forecast of the impact global warning will have on individual Australian states and capital cities paints a grim picture of NSW's future as dry and deadly.  The Climate Institute of Australia's report, released in Melbourne yesterday, explains the local ramifications of a major international report by the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.  It warns that unless urgent action is taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, there will be devastating consequences.

Australia is the 10th largest greenhouse gas emitter in the world and has recorded a 10 per cent increase over the past 10 years, with a 17 per cent growth predicted by 2020.  Scientists are demanding new government policies to reduce emissions but Prime Minister John Howard showed no indication of acquiescing yesterday.  Global warming is almost certainly set to increase by one per cent by 2020.   For NSW, this means droughts will become 70 per cent more frequent and widespread, while the number of annual heatwave deaths in Sydney will more than double from 176 to up to 417.

Snow-covered alpine regions would shrink by up to 40 per cent and extreme weather conditions would increase by a quarter.   But if the pattern continues and global warming reaches more than three per cent by between 2060 to 2100, NSW will be a virtual disaster zone.   Dengue fever would spread into Sydney, flow in the Murray-Darling Basin would fall by almost 50 per cent and there would be more than 1312 heatwave deaths in the capital every year.   Snow-covered alpine regions would disappear by up to 85 per cent, the Macquarie River basin would drop by up to 35 per cent and extreme fire weather conditions could increase by about 75 per cent in spots like Coffs Harbour and Sydney Airport.   There would also be significantly less run-offs into many rivers.   Erwin Jackson, advisor to the Climate Institute, believes Australia should be leading the way in adopting environmentally-friendly policies because it is so vulnerable to the effects of global warming.

"There is overwhelming support within the Australian community, the business community and now the scientific community that climate change is a very serious issue which needs to be addressed,'' he said.   "We have already wasted 10 years, during which time emissions have increased by 10 per cent. We can't look our children in the face in 20 years time and say we didn't do anything.''  He called on Mr Howard to re-assess his stance on climate change in light of the new reports.  However, the Prime Minister was unmoved by the findings, which he described as "something we have known for a long time''.   He said Australia would continue measures to reduce emissions but only in a way that  "does not unfairly hurt or damage the Australian economy and destroy Australian jobs''.   He said nuclear power could be part of the solution but ruled out signing the Kyoto agreement.” (The Sunday Telegraph, Feb. 4, 2007).

 

Cardinal Pell said that January was a cold month, yet this is what the same newspaper published on the same day. 

 

“January world temperatures highest ever”  World temperatures in January were the highest ever recorded for that month of the year.  "The combined global land and ocean surface temperature was the highest for any January on record,'' according to scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Climate Data Centre in Asheville, North Carolina.   The combined global land and ocean surface temperature was 0.85 degrees celsius warmer than the 20th-century average of 12 degrees celsius for January based on preliminary data, NOAA said.  The figures surpass the previous record set in 2002 at 0.71 degrees celsius above average.  Land surface temperature was a record 1.89C warmer than average, while global ocean surface temperature was the fourth warmest in 128 years, about 0.05 degrees celsius cooler than the record established during the very strong El Nino climate phenomenon in 1998. . .  "The presence of El Nino along with the continuing global warming trend contributed to the record warm January,'' NOAA said.  The unusually warm conditions contributed to the second lowest January snow cover extent on record for the Eurasian continent.  "During the past century, global surface temperatures have increased at a rate near 0.06 degrees celsius per decade, but the rate of increase has been three times larger since 1976, or 0.18 degrees celsius per decade, with some of the largest temperature increases occurring in the high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere." (The Sunday Telegraph, Feb.18, 2007).

 

Cardinal Pell said that there was no increase in global temperatures between 1998 and 2005, yet this article says that 2002 was a record year with an increase of no less than 0.71 degree Celsius, an enormous jump for a single year.  

Are we also doomsayers and scaremongers because we put all this evidence before people so that they realise the perilous condition in which they find themselves, or is the Catholic Church clinging on to straws in a desperate attempt to deny reality and postpone the fulfillment of God’s prophecies?   

The whole of the Christian world, not to speak of other religions, is in a denying mood.  They do not want to hear about overpopulation, diminishing resources, global warming, climate change, peak in oil supply, or anything that might bring their reign to a precipitous end.  It is an insidious plot from the leading religious institutions of our time to cloud people’s minds with falsehoods and misrepresentations in an attempt to lull them into a false sense of security.  The tragedy of it is that they succeed at it.  This is why Jesus said that the Great Tribulation will take the world by surprise, as the people of Noah’s time were taken by the Flood. 

 

38For as in the days before the flood, they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, 39and did not know until the flood came and took them all away, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be.” (Mat. 24:38-39).   

 

The world has passed the point of no return.  The sooner our leaders realise this, and turn to the only power that can save humanity now – our Almighty Creator  – the less suffering will be in the world, and the more people will be saved.     

A decade and a half ago, we said that the world had entered the time of the following prophecy.  

 

“Then the fourth angel poured out his bowl on the sun, and power was given to him to scorch men with fire. 9And men were scorched with great heat, and they blasphemed the name of God who has power over these plagues; and they did not repent and give Him glory.” (Revelation 16:8-9).

 

Now not only has this prophecy been fulfilled, but because people have not repented of their evil ways and continued to blaspheme God, things have gotten considerable worse.  For this reason we are announcing that this prophecy is now coming to an end, and the following one about to take its place.   

 

“17Then the seventh angel poured out his bowl into the air, and a loud voice came out of the temple of heaven, from the throne, saying, “It is done!” 18And there were noises and thunderings and lightnings; and there was a great earthquake, such a mighty and great earthquake as had not occurred since men were on the earth.  19Now the great city was divided into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell. And great Babylon was remembered before God, to give her the cup of the wine of the fierceness of His wrath. 20Then every island fled away, and the mountains were not found. 21And great hail from heaven fell upon men, each hailstone about the weight of a talent. Men blasphemed God because of the plague of the hail, since that plague was exceedingly great.” (Rev. 16:17-21).

 

Will people believe us this time?  Will they turn to God and save themselves from this ‘exceedingly great plague’, or will they continue to sin, blaspheme God, and face His wrath and eternal damnation?  Only a fool would want to wait another decade and a half to see whether we are right this time too.  There just isn’t that time anymore.   

This is how the wise of this world have failed humanity. They have either denied God altogether, or sent people on wrong paths to find solutions to their problems.  The result is all too clear for all to see: this world is truly on its last legs. 

 

 

 

 

                  Why Have People Lost Faith In God

               When They Need It Most? 

 

It used to be that when God sent messengers to warn people of dire consequences because of their sins, they repented, changed their way of life, and escaped their punishment.  A clear example of that is Jonas and the Ninevites.            

 

1Now the word of the Lord came to Jonah the son of Amittai, saying, 2“Arise, go to Nineveh, that great city, and cry out against it; for their wickedness has come up before Me.” 3But Jonah arose to flee to Tarshish from the presence of the Lord. He went down to Joppa, and found a ship going to Tarshish; so he paid the fare, and went down into it, to go with them to Tarshish from the presence of the Lord.   . . .

1Now the word of the Lord came to Jonah the second time, saying, 2“Arise, go to Nineveh, that great city, and preach to it the message that I tell you.” 3So Jonah arose and went to Nineveh, according to the word of the Lord. Now Nineveh was an exceedingly great city,  a three-day journey in extent. 4And Jonah began to enter the city on the first day’s walk. Then he cried out and said, “Yet forty days, and Nineveh shall be overthrown!”

5So the people of Nineveh believed God, proclaimed a fast, and put on sackcloth, from the greatest to the least of them. 6Then word came to the king of Nineveh; and he arose from his throne and laid aside his robe, covered himself with sackcloth and sat in ashes. 7And he caused it to be proclaimed and published throughout Nineveh by the decree of the king and his nobles, saying,   ‘Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste anything; do not let them eat, or drink water. 8But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily to God; yes, let every one turn from his evil way and from the violence that is in his hands. 9Who can tell if God will turn and relent, and turn away from His fierce anger, so that we may not perish?’  10Then God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God relented from the disaster that He had said He would bring upon them, and He did not do it. . .

1But it displeased Jonah exceedingly, and he became angry. 2So he prayed to the Lord, and said, “Ah, Lord, was not this what I said when I was still in my country? Therefore I fled previously to Tarshish; for I know that You are a gracious and merciful God, slow to anger and abundant in lovingkindness, One who relents from doing harm. 3Therefore now, O Lord, please take my life from me, for it is better for me to die than to live!”  4Then the Lord said, “Is it right for you to be angry?”

5So Jonah went out of the city and sat on the east side of the city. There he made himself a shelter and sat under it in the shade, till he might see what would become of the city. 6And the Lord God prepared a plant and made it come up over Jonah, that it might be shade for his head to deliver him from his misery. So Jonah was very grateful for the plant. 7But as morning dawned the next day God prepared a worm, and it so damaged the plant that it withered. 8And it happened, when the sun arose, that God prepared a vehement east wind; and the sun beat on Jonah’s head, so that he grew faint. Then he wished death for himself, and said, “It is better for me to die than to live.”

9Then God said to Jonah, “Is it right for you to be angry about the plant?”

And he said, “It is right for me to be angry, even to death!”   10But the Lord said, “You have had pity on the plant for which you have not labored, nor made it grow, which came up in a night and perished in a night. 11And should I not pity Nineveh, that great city, in which are more than one hundred and twenty thousand persons who cannot discern between their right hand and their left—and much livestock?” (Jonah 1:1-3; 3:1-10; 4:1-11).

 

When they heard the warning from God they did not say, ‘who is this stranger to tell us what to do and how to live our lives’, as we often hear these days; they repented, fasted, prayed, and worshiped God.  The king himself took the initiative and gave an unusual but powerful decree:

 

“‘Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste anything; do not let them eat, or drink water. 8But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily to God; yes, let every one turn from his evil way and from the violence that is in his hands. 9Who can tell if God will turn and relent, and turn away from His fierce anger, so that we may not perish?’”

 

While humans were to turn from their evil ways and cry mightily to God, both humans and animals were to fast and be covered in sackcloth.  And what happened then?  God saw their works that they turned from their evil way; and He relented from the disaster that He had said He would bring upon them, and He did not do it.

At no time in history has the world been in greater peril than it is now.  Yet there never has been less faith in God than it is now.  Why?  Because the ‘wise’ of this world have convinced humanity that there is no God!

Has God stopped sending His messengers to the world, when they are needed most, because the world has turned its back to Him?  Certainly not!  Never before have the Scriptures been preached and explained more clearly, more widely, and more forcefully, than has been the case in the last decade and a half.  And what has been humanity’s response to that?  Disdain, calumnies, threats and isolation.

We began publishing The Christian Herald in 1990, but the work of the Gospel began in fact in 1973 when I went to the headquarters of the Worldwide Church of God with a message from God.  How was I received by the ‘luminaries’ of that Church? Like Jonas by the Ninevites?  No, like Paul by the Jews when he began to preach Christ to them.   

Like Jonas however, I run away from doing any further work for God when they robbed me and locked me out of my own flat.  I could not understand why God let those charlatans treat me that way when all I wanted to do was to show them from the Scriptures the errors in the gospel they were preaching.  

Like many of my contemporaries, I assumed that once you start working for God, you get His blessings and protection, when the very opposite happened to me.  After all, isn’t this the gospel they are preaching in the churches these days?  But that is not the gospel that Jesus’ Apostles preached, for what happened to me is what happened to them long ago.   

What made me even angrier was the fact that I had withdrawn myself from a course in electrical engineering at Toronto University, which would have been a natural course for me given that I had qualifications in that field, in order to study humanity subjects such as study of religions and ancient history.  Now my world was crumbling around me and I was at a loss as to why it happened and what to do next.  Well, what I did next was to run away from those creatures, and immigrated to Australia.  I run away from them, but not from God, because in my new country I decided to continue my studies in the humanity subjects.  In hindsight, I can clearly see the hand of God in all that happened to me those days.  I had enthusiasm, some knowledge of the Scriptures, and a message from God, but I was far from being mature enough and secure in that mission.  It took no less than a decade and a half of intense studies, both privately and in tertiary institutions, before God visited me again and sent me to do His work again.    

One of the questions I am often asked is how does God communicate with me, or I with Him, and how do I know it is He who speaks with me? It is a question that usually comes from mockers and unbelievers, which makes it even harder to explain, for once a person decide to take a position against God, it is virtually impossible to change his mind. 

Even the apostles had a hard time explaining their visions or how God dealt with them.    

 

“1It is doubtless not profitable for me to boast. I will come to visions and revelations of the Lord: 2I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago—whether in the body I do not know, or whether out of the body I do not know, God knows—such a one was caught up to the third heaven. 3And I know such a man—whether in the body or out of the body I do not know, God knows—4how he was caught up into Paradise and heard inexpressible words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter. 5Of such a one I will boast; yet of myself I will not boast, except in my infirmities. 6For though I might desire to boast, I will not be a fool; for I will speak the truth. But I refrain, lest anyone should think of me above what he sees me to be or hears from me.

7And lest I should be exalted above measure by the abundance of the revelations, a thorn in the flesh was given to me, a messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I be exalted above measure. 8Concerning this thing I pleaded with the Lord three times that it might depart from me. 9And He said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for My strength is made perfect in weakness.” Therefore most gladly I will rather boast in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. 10Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in needs, in persecutions, in distresses, for Christ’s sake. For when I am weak, then I am strong.

11I have become a fool in boasting; you have compelled me. For I ought to have been commended by you; for in nothing was I behind the most eminent apostles, though I am nothing. 12Truly the signs of an apostle were accomplished among you with all perseverance, in signs and wonders and mighty deeds. 13For what is it in which you were inferior to other churches, except that I myself was not burdensome to you? Forgive me this wrong!” (2 Cor. 12:1-13) 

 

Apostle Paul could not explain his visions of Paradise – whether he was there in the body or out of body. All he knew was that it was a miracle, and like all miracles, could not be explained in terms of our experience of the world.  It has been like that with the prophets of God since the beginning of the world.  

Now the Corinthians could easily have said, ‘this guy does not even know what he is talking about, and is he teaching us how to live our lives?’  But they didn’t.  Instead they listened to him carefully and followed his advice to the letter, so much so that he even had to chastise them later on for going overboard in certain aspects.  

In the second paragraph, Paul speaks of a thorn in his flesh given to him by Satan, which God would not remove.  Now consider God’s reply to his request:  “My grace is sufficient for you, for My strength is made perfect in weakness.”  

Had I known this principle three decades ago, or the trials Jesus’ disciples would undergo in their mission for God, I would not have been so disheartened by my misfortune, but rejoice that I was found worthy to receive a similar treatment. 

 

“29But Peter and the other apostles answered and said: “We ought to obey God rather than men. 30The God of our fathers raised up Jesus whom you murdered by hanging on a tree. 31Him God has exalted to His right hand to be Prince and Savior, to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins. 32And we are His witnesses to these things, and so also is the Holy Spirit whom God has given to those who obey Him.”

33When they heard this, they were furious and plotted to kill them. 34Then one in the council stood up, a Pharisee named Gamaliel, a teacher of the law held in respect by all the people, and commanded them to put the apostles outside for a little while. 35And he said to them: “Men of Israel, take heed to yourselves what you intend to do regarding these men. 36For some time ago Theudas rose up, claiming to be somebody. A number of men, about four hundred, joined him. He was slain, and all who obeyed him were scattered and came to nothing. 37After this man, Judas of Galilee rose up in the days of the census, and drew away many people after him. He also perished, and all who obeyed him were dispersed. 38And now I say to you, keep away from these men and let them alone; for if this plan or this work is of men, it will come to nothing; 39but if it is of God, you cannot overthrow it—lest you even be found to fight against God.”  40And they agreed with him, and when they had called for the apostles and beaten them, they commanded that they should not speak in the name of Jesus, and let them go. 41So they departed from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for His name42And daily in the temple, and in every house, they did not cease teaching and preaching Jesus as the Christ.” (Acts 5:29-42) 

 

Jesus’ disciples suffered trials at the hand of unbelievers, whereas I received them from ‘Christians’.  However it did not take long before they too had to contend with false Christians and false preachers.      

 

23Are they ministers of Christ?—I speak as a fool—I am more: in labors more abundant, in stripes above measure, in prisons more frequently, in deaths often. 24From the Jews five times I received forty stripes minus one. 25Three times I was beaten with rods; once I was stoned; three times I was shipwrecked; a night and a day I have been in the deep; 26in journeys often, in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils of my own countrymen, in perils of the Gentiles, in perils in the city, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, in perils among false brethren; 27in weariness and toil, in sleeplessness often, in hunger and thirst, in fastings often, in cold and nakedness—28besides the other things, what comes upon me daily: my deep concern for all the churches. 29Who is weak, and I am not weak? Who is made to stumble, and I do not burn with indignation?

30If I must boast, I will boast in the things which concern my infirmity. 31The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed forever, knows that I am not lying. 32In Damascus the governor, under Aretas the king, was guarding the city of the Damascenes with a garrison, desiring to arrest me; 33but I was let down in a basket through a window in the wall, and escaped from his hands.” (2 Cor. 11:23-33). 

 

We know that even these days many Christians suffer loss, even of life, in countries that do not accept Jesus Christ, but few Christians realise that over the centuries more true Christians have endured tribulations and lost their lives at the hands of people who falsely claimed to be Christians than at the hands of pagans.  This is why I no longer wonder that my baptism of fire occurred at the hands of false Christians. The important thing is to turn those trials to your advantage, to use them to strengthen your faith, and not let them destroy it.    

 

“Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ,  To the pilgrims of the Dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, 2elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, in sanctification of the Spirit, for obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ:

Grace to you and peace be multiplied.  3Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His abundant mercy has begotten us again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, 4to an inheritance incorruptible and undefiled and that does not fade away, reserved in heaven for you, 5who are kept by the power of God through faith for salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.

6In this you greatly rejoice, though now for a little while, if need be, you have been grieved by various trials, 7that the genuineness of your faith, being much more precious than gold that perishes, though it is tested by fire, may be found to praise, honor, and glory at the revelation of Jesus Christ, 8whom having not seen you love. Though now you do not see Him, yet believing, you rejoice with joy inexpressible and full of glory, 9receiving the end of your faith—the salvation of your souls.

10Of this salvation the prophets have inquired and searched carefully, who prophesied of the grace that would come to you, 11searching what, or what manner of time, the Spirit of Christ who was in them was indicating when He testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ and the glories that would follow. 12To them it was revealed that, not to themselves, but to us they were ministering the things which now have been reported to you through those who have preached the gospel to you by the Holy Spirit sent from heaven—things which angels desire to look into.  13Therefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and rest your hope fully upon the grace that is to be brought to you at the revelation of Jesus Christ; 14as obedient children, not conforming yourselves to the former lusts, as in your ignorance; 15but as He who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct, 16because it is written, “Be holy, for I am holy.”

17And if you call on the Father, who without partiality judges according to each one’s work, conduct yourselves throughout the time of your stay here in fear; 18knowing that you were not redeemed with corruptible things, like silver or gold, from your aimless conduct received by tradition from your fathers, 19but with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot. 20He indeed was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you 21who through Him believe in God, who raised Him from the dead and gave Him glory, so that your faith and hope are in God.  22Since you have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit in sincere love of the brethren, love one another fervently with a pure heart, 23having been born again, not of corruptible seed but incorruptible, through the word of God which lives and abides forever, 24because, “All flesh is as grass,  And £all the glory of man as the flower of the grass.  The grass withers,  And its flower falls away,25  But the word of the Lord endures forever.”

Now this is the word which by the gospel was preached to you.” (1 Peter 1:1-25)

 

This would be a good place to finish, with such wonderful words from Apostle Peter, but three are more things to be said.  Continued Peter:

 

12Beloved, do not think it strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened to you; 13but rejoice to the extent that you partake of Christ’s sufferings, that when His glory is revealed, you may also be glad with exceeding joy. 14If you are reproached for the name of Christ, blessed are you, for the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you. On their part He is blasphemed, but on your part He is glorified. 15But let none of you suffer as a murderer, a thief, an evildoer, or as a busybody in other people’s matters. 16Yet if anyone suffers as a Christian, let him not be ashamed, but let him glorify God in this matter.

17For the time has come for judgment to begin at the house of God; and if it begins with us first, what will be the end of those who do not obey the gospel of God? 18Now, “If the righteous one is scarcely saved, Where will the ungodly and the sinner appear?”  9Therefore let those who suffer according to the will of God commit their souls to Him in doing good, as to a faithful Creator.” (1 Peter 4:12-19)

I spoke of the trials that Jesus’ disciples endured, but of course, no one endured more than Jesus Christ Himself.  He too endured them at the hands of those who claimed to be believers – God’s chosen people – who in so doing thought they did God a service.  Isn’t it extraordinary how the worst murderers put their actions on behalf of God?  It has happened since the beginning of the world, and it is happening today.    

For the people of God however, trials, even loss of life, work towards their betterment.  God rejoices when one of His faithful dies.   “5Precious in the sight of the Lord Is the death of His saints.” (Ps. 116:15).  Now if God rejoices over our death, shouldn’t we do the same? 

This brings us to the second point regarding our means of communication with God.  Apostle Paul enjoins us to acquire the mind of God in order to be like Jesus Christ.

 

5Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus6who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, 7but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men. 8And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross. 9Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is above every name, 10that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, 11and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” (Ph. 2:5). 

   

     Now what mind was in Christ Jesus?   The mind of God, of course!  This does not mean that God transplanted His mind in Jesus Christ, but that Jesus acquired it in the course of His upbringing.  And how did He do it?  By studying the Word of God, and by being obedient to God!

 “1 Blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law of the Lord!

2 Blessed are those who keep His testimonies, who seek Him with the whole heart!

3 They also do no iniquity;  They walk in His ways.

4 You have commanded us to keep Your precepts diligently.”

 

5 I will meditate on Your precepts, and contemplate Your ways.

16  I will delight myself in Your statutes;  I will not forget Your word.” (Ps. 119:1-4, 15-16)

 

65 “You have dealt well with Your servant, O Lord, according to Your word.

66 Teach me good judgment and knowledge, for I believe Your commandments.

67 Before I was afflicted I went astray, but now I keep Your word.

68 You are good, and do good; teach me Your statutes.

69 The proud have forged a lie against me, but I will keep Your precepts with my whole heart.

70 Their heart is as fat as grease, but I delight in Your law.

71 It is good for me that I have been afflicted, that I may learn Your statutes.

72 The law of Your mouth is better to me than thousands of coins of gold and silver.”

 

78 “Let the proud be ashamed, for they treated me wrongfully with falsehood; But I will meditate on Your precepts.

79  Let those who fear You turn to me, those who know Your testimonies.

80 Let my heart be blameless regarding Your statutes, that I may not be ashamed.”

 

97 “Oh, how I love Your law! It is my meditation all the day.

98 You, through Your commandments, make me wiser than my enemies; for they are ever with me.

99  I have more understanding than all my teachers, for Your testimonies are my meditation.

100 I understand more than the ancients, because I keep Your precepts.” (Ps.119:65-72, 78-80, 97-100).

 

There is no greater lesson on how to acquire wisdom than this one.  For nothing indeed could make one wiser than the Word of God – the very mind of God.  This then is how Jesus Christ obtained His wisdom, His mind of God.  And this is how you can obtain it too.  Try it, it won’t harm you, and who knows, you may even surprise yourself with a new mind.  But for this you need faith.  And here is the crux of the problem: faith comes from God too, and for Him to grant it, you must get on your knees and pray to Him and worship Him in truth and in spirit.  If you are too proud for that, you will retain your current mind and say good bye to any chance of salvation. 

 

4But God, who is rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, 5even when we were dead in trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), 6and raised us up together, and made us sit together in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, 7that in the ages to come He might show the exceeding riches of His grace in His kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. 8For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, 9not of works, lest anyone should boast. 10For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.” (Eph.2:4-10)

   

We are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works.   If you do not believe that you were created in the image of Jesus Christ for good works, but in the image of monkeys for the law of the jungle, then you cannot complain of your destiny, which is to be wiped out from the face of the earth and becoming ashes under the feet of the righteous. 

 

“17   The memory of him perishes from the earth,  And he has no name among the renowned.

18    He is driven from light into darkness, And chased out of the world.

19    He has neither son nor posterity among his people, Nor any remaining in his dwellings.

20    Those in the west are astonished at his day, As those in the east are frightened.

21    Surely such are the dwellings of the wicked, And this is the place of him who does not know God.” (Job 18:17-21)

 

1    Do not keep silent, O God of my praise!  For the mouth of the wicked and the mouth of the deceitful have opened against me;

     They have spoken against me with a lying tongue.

3    They have also surrounded me with words of hatred,  And fought against me without a cause.

4    In return for my love they are my accusers,  But I give myself to prayer.

5    Thus they have rewarded me evil for good,  And hatred for my love.” (Ps. 109:1-5)

 

1     The fool has said in his heart, “There is no God.”

     They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none who does good.

2    The Lord looks down from heaven upon the children of men,  To see if there are any who understand, who seek God.

3    They have all turned aside, They have together become corrupt; There is none who does good,  No, not one.

4    Have all the workers of iniquity no knowledge, Who eat up my people as they eat bread,  And do not call on the Lord?

5    There they are in great fear, For God is with the generation of the righteous.

6    You shame the counsel of the poor,  But the Lord is his refuge.” (Ps.14: 1-6)

 

Isn’t this what characterises our world today? They say there is no God, and God says that there is none who does good, that all have become corrupt. O yes, there are many who donate to charities and work for the poor, but they do so for their own glory, on this earth, not for merit in heaven and for the glory of God.  Otherwise God would not say that they have all turned aside, that none seek the Lord.  But what about the preachers who make so much noise in their congregations, don’t they believe in God and do the right thing as far as God is concerned?  This is God’s answer to that:  

 

34 “Wail, shepherds, and cry! Roll about in the ashes, You leaders of the flock! For the days of your slaughter and your dispersions are fulfilled;  You shall fall like a precious vessel. And the shepherds will have no way to flee, Nor the leaders of the flock to escape.” (Jer. 25:34-35).

1 “For behold, the day is coming, burning like an oven, and all the proud, yes, all who do wickedly will be stubble.  And the day which is coming shall burn them up,” Says the Lord of hosts, “That will leave them neither root nor branch.  2 But to you who fear My name The Sun of Righteousness shall arise With healing in His wings; And you shall go out and grow fat like stall-fed calves.   3 You shall trample the wicked, for they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet On the day that I do this,  Says the Lord of hosts.” (Mal.4:1-3).

 

This then is what faith is all about: having confidence in the righteous judgment of God and the fact that in the end the wicked will become ashes under the feet of the righteous.  Yes, someone might say, but these words are about the preachers and the people of ancient Israel, aren’t they?   Yes, but the following ones are not.   

 

And He said to them, 24“Strive to enter through the narrow gate, for many, I say to you, will seek to enter and will not be able. 25When once the Master of the house has risen up and shut the door, and you begin to stand outside and knock at the door, saying, ‘Lord, Lord, open for us,’ and He will answer and say to you, ‘I do not know you, where you are from,’ 26then you will begin to say, ‘We ate and drank in Your presence, and You taught in our streets.’ 27But He will say, ‘I tell you I do not know you, where you are from. Depart from Me, all you workers of iniquity.’ 28There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when you see Abraham and Isaac and Jacob and all the prophets in the kingdom of God, and yourselves thrust out. 29They will come from the east and the west, from the north and the south, and sit down in the kingdom of God30And indeed there are last who will be first, and there are first who will be last.” (Luke 13:24-30)

 

25“And indeed, now I know that you all, among whom I have gone preaching the kingdom of God, will see my face no more.  26Therefore I testify to you this day that I am innocent of the blood of all men. 27For I have not shunned to declare to you the whole counsel of  God.  28Therefore take heed to yourselves and to all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church £of God which He purchased with His own blood. 29For I know this, that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock. 30Also from among yourselves men will rise up, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after  themselves. Therefore watch, and remember that for three years I did not cease to warn everyone night and day with tears.”(Acts 20:25-31).

 

12But what I do, I will also continue to do, that I may cut off the opportunity from those who desire an opportunity to be regarded just as we are in the things of which they boast. 13For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into apostles of Christ. 14And no wonder! For Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light. 15Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also transform themselves into ministers of righteousness, whose end will be according to their works.” (2 Cor 11: 12-15).

 

Don’t trust anyone regarding your salvation until you have checked it out in the Bible.  For if the world was full of ‘savage wolves’ and false preachers in the time of the apostles, it is infinitely worse now.  Have faith only in those who are prepared to have their preaching assessed by the standards of the Bible, for by looking in the Scriptures you will increase your faith too.  Because many are those who claim to speak for Jesus Christ and yet deceive their listeners.  

 

“And Jesus answered and said to them: “Take heed that no one deceives you. 5For many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will deceive many.” (Mat. 24:4-5). 

  5Examine yourselves as to whether you are in the faith. Test yourselves. Do you not know yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you?—unless indeed you are disqualified. 6But I trust that you will know that we are not disqualified.” (2 Cor. 13:5-6).

 

During one of his public escapades, for which John Paul II became renowned around the world, television cameras focused on two nuns that prostrated themselves before him and said: ‘Holy Father increase our faith’!  He gave them a wry smile and walked away.  This is what humanity has come to: prostrate before a human being and ask him to increase their faith.  And this from persons who ought to know better.  But what do the Scriptures say?  

 

10“And I fell at [the angel’s] feet to worship him. But he said to me, “See that you do not do that! I am your fellow servant, and of your brethren who have the testimony of Jesus. Worship God! For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.” Rev. 19:10).

 

Catholic prelates do not want to talk about prophecy, especially those of the book of Revelation. (See TCH 14 and 15 to see why).   How then can people increase their faith?  This is how: “Faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.” (Rom. 10:17).

When Apostle Paul wrote that epistle, books were very expensive. The only way by which people could increase their faith was to hear the Word of God. These days however, they can read the Word of God for themselves. Anyone who wants a Bible can have one.

Of course, they can increase their faith by going to church too, but which church? Which one preaches the truth these days when so many are in opposition to each other and even fighting among themselves? This is why the only sure way of increasing your faith is to have your own Scriptures. Read them and compare them with what they preach in the churches, and with what is happening in the world.  In so doing you will avoid the destiny of those who go to perdition because they did not do their home work and blindly accepted the false preachings that are so prevalent in the world today.

 

 

 

                  Salvation By No Other Name Except Jesus Christ

Christians should be first in acknowledging that there is no name by which people may be saved other than Jesus Christ.  Yet, in an attempt to create a harmonious ecumenical movement, more and more of them are saying that all religions have the same God and all lead to the same place.  Well, that is just not true.  And this is why.        

 

8Then Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them, “Rulers of the people and elders of Israel: 9If we this day are judged for a good deed done to a helpless man, by what means he has been made well, 10let it be known to you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead, by Him this man stands here before you whole. 11This is the ‘stone which was rejected by you builders, which has become the chief cornerstone.’ 12Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” (Acts 4:8-12).  

 

If there is no salvation in any other name but Jesus Christ, in what name do other religions save their people?  And how do they know that their spiritual leader is a genuine savior?  Has he proven himself by giving his life and taking it back as Jesus Christ did?  

 

17“Therefore My Father loves Me, because I lay down My life that I may take it again. 18No one takes it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This command I have received from My Father.” (John 10:17-18).

 

Only one man in the history of the world has been on ‘the other side’, so to speak, and come back to tell us the way to eternal life.  For that reason the Father loved Him and made Him Lord over both the physical and spiritual worlds.

 

18“Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. 19Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Amen.” (Mat. 28:18-20).

 

If Jesus’ followers were to go out into the world and make disciples of all the nations in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, could any other religion have such powerful backing to rival the very Creator of the world, His Son and the Holy Spirit?   Jesus proved through His sacrifice to be the true Messiah, and Christianity to be His true religion. The Word of God in general and the prophecies of the Bible in particular, have amply supported that claim.     

5    “To whom will you liken Me, and make Me equal and compare Me, that we should be alike?

6     They lavish gold out of the bag, and weigh silver on the scales;

      They hire a goldsmith, and he makes it a god; They prostrate themselves, yes, they worship.

7     They bear it on the shoulder, they carry it and set it in its place, and it stands; from its place it shall not move. 

      Though one cries out to it, yet it cannot answer nor save him out of his trouble.

8    “Remember this, and show yourselves men; Recall to mind, O you transgressors.

9     Remember the former things of old, for I am God, and there is no other;  I am God, and there is none like Me,

10    Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times things that are not yet done,

      Saying, ‘My counsel shall stand, and I will do all My pleasure,’

11   Calling a bird of prey from the east, the man who executes My counsel, from a far country.

      Indeed I have spoken it; I will also bring it to pass. I have purposed it; I will also do it.” (Is. 46:5-11). 

  

While Jesus Christ was in the world, He told His disciples why He alone was a good shepherd, and why none of those who came before Him were good shepherds. 

 

7”Then Jesus said to them again, “Most assuredly, I say to you, I am the door of the sheep. 8All who ever came before Me are thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not hear them. 9I am the door. If anyone enters by Me, he will be saved, and will go in and out and find pasture. 10The thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly.

11“I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd gives His life for the sheep. 12But a hireling, he who is not the shepherd, one who does not own the sheep, sees the wolf coming and leaves the sheep and flees; and the wolf catches the sheep and scatters them. 13The hireling flees because he is a hireling and does not care about the sheep. 14I am the good shepherd; and I know My sheep, and am known by My own. 15As the Father knows Me, even so I know the Father; and I lay down My life for the sheep. 16And other sheep I have which are not of this fold; them also I must bring, and they will hear My voice; and there will be one flock and one shepherd.”  (John 10: 7-16).

 

None of those who came before Him, and none who came after Him, were good shepherds, for none gave their life for the sheep in the manner of Jesus Christ.   No other person in the history of the world has made such a claim and proved it to be true.  Therefore saying that all people have the same God and have an equal chance of salvation regardless on what religion they follow is not only a deadly error, but a blasphemy, for it denies the Scriptures in general and the words of Jesus Christ in particular. It would be tantamount to saying that Jesus’ murderers were God’s children and would be saved too. But what did Jesus Christ say?

 

39”They answered and said to Him, “Abraham is our father.”  Jesus said to them, “If you were Abraham’s children, you would do the works of Abraham. 40But now you seek to kill Me, a Man who has told you the truth which I heard from God. Abraham did not do this. 41You do the deeds of your father.”  Then they said to Him, “We were not born of fornication; we have one Father—God.”

42Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I proceeded forth and came from God; nor have I come of Myself, but He sent Me. 43Why do you not understand My speech? Because you are not able to listen to My word. 44You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it. 45But because I tell the truth, you do not believe Me. 46Which of you convicts Me of sin? And if I tell the truth, why do you not believe Me? 47He who is of God hears God’s words; therefore you do not hear, because you are not of God.” (John 8:39-47).

 

This passage, more than any other, spells out clearly that there are two kinds of people in the world: those who are children of God, and those who are children of the Devil.  What distinguishes one from the other?  Their fruits, obedience to God, and their attitude to life!

 

The first obey God and value life, while the second obey their father and destroy life.   Judged by their physical appearance, they look the same – they are all human beings – but inwardly some are sheep while others wolves.  It does not matter what they believe, or whether they think that they serve God; what matters is what they do in this world. 

Notice what Jesus Christ said about salvation.

 

          13“Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it.  14Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.  15“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16You will know them by their fruits.” (Mat. 7:13-16).

 

Now what does that tell you about those who are behind the ecumenical movement that aims to create a universal religion? Whose job do you think they are doing?  That initiative is not sanctioned in the Bible, except in the negative sense.

They will not be any more successful in bringing the whole world under one umbrella now, than the people who lived before the tower of Babel were able to stay united then.  And why so?  Because this world has been set up for a short duration, for a specific purpose.  Read carefully the following chapter from the book of Romans, for it says many important things about salvation which we cannot cover in this short article.  

 

“1I tell the truth in Christ, I am not lying, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Spirit, 2that I have great sorrow and continual grief in my heart. 3For I could wish that I myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my countrymen according to the flesh, 4who are Israelites, to whom pertain the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the service of God, and the promises; 5of whom are the fathers and from whom, according to the flesh, Christ came, who is over all, the eternally blessed God. Amen.

6But it is not that the word of God has taken no effect. For they are not all Israel who are of Israel7nor are they all children because they are the seed of Abraham; but, “In Isaac your seed shall be called.”  8That is, those who are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God; but the children of the promise are counted as the seed. 9For this is the word of promise: “At this time I will come and Sarah shall have a son.”

10And not only this, but when Rebecca also had conceived by one man, even by our father Isaac 11(for the children not yet being born, nor having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works but of Him who calls), 12it was said to her, “The older shall serve the younger.” 13As it is written, “Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated.”

14What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? Certainly not! 15For He says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whomever I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whomever I will have compassion.” 16So then it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy. 17For the Scripture says to the Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I may show My power in you, and that My name may be declared in all the earth.” 18Therefore He has mercy on whom He wills, and whom He wills He hardens.   19You will say to me then, “Why does He still find fault? For who has resisted His will?” 20But indeed, O man, who are you to reply against God? Will the thing formed say to him who formed it, “Why have you made me like this?” 21Does not the potter have power over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and another for dishonor?

22What if God, wanting to show His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, 23and that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy, which He had prepared beforehand for glory, 24even us whom He called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?

25As He says also in Hosea:  “I will call them My people, who were not My people, And her beloved, who was not beloved.”  26“And it shall come to pass in the place where it was said to them, ‘You are not My people,’  There they shall be called sons of the living God.”

27Isaiah also cries out concerning Israel: “Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea,  The remnant will be saved.  28 For He will finish the work and cut it short in righteousness,  Because the Lord will make a short work upon the earth.”  29And as Isaiah said before: “Unless the Lord of £Sabaoth had left us a seed,  We would have become like Sodom, And we would have been made like Gomorrah.”   

30What shall we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness of faith; 31but Israel, pursuing the law of righteousness, has not attained to the law of righteousness. 32Why? Because they did not seek it by faith, but as it were, by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumbling stone. 33As it is written:   “Behold, I lay in Zion a stumbling stone and rock of offense,  And whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.” (Rom.9:1-33).

 

It is easier to understand what Apostle Paul spoke about here if you know that the Devil itself was created for a specific purpose.  

 

1    “The preparations of the heart belong to man,  But the answer of the tongue is from the Lord.

2    All the ways of a man are pure in his own eyes,  But the Lord weighs the spirits.

3    Commit your works to the Lord,  And your thoughts will be established.

4    The Lord has made all for Himself, Yes, even the wicked for the day of doom.” (Pr.16:1-4).

 

What is the lesson in all this?  That unless one submits to God in love and humility, not in wanton destruction of innocent life as we see in the world these days in the name of other gods, he cannot be a genuine child of God.  And who is a child of God?

 

1”Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed on us, that we should be called children of God! Therefore the world does not know us, because it did not know Him. 2Beloved, now we are children of God; and it has not yet been revealed what we shall be, but we know that when He is revealed, we shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as He is. 3And everyone who has this hope in Him purifies himself, just as He is pure.  4Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness. 5And you know that He was manifested to take away our sins, and in Him there is no sin. 6Whoever abides in Him does not sin. Whoever sins has neither seen Him nor known Him.

7Little children, let no one deceive you. He who practices righteousness is righteous, just as He is righteous. 8He who sins is of the devil, for the devil has sinned from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that He might destroy the works of the devil. 9Whoever has been born of God does not sin, for His seed remains in him; and he cannot sin, because he has been born of God.

10In this the children of God and the children of the devil are manifest: Whoever does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor is he who does not love his brother. 11For this is the message that you heard from the beginning, that we should love one another, 12not as Cain who was of the wicked one and murdered his brother. And why did he murder him? Because his works were evil and his brother’s righteous.   13Do not marvel, my brethren, if the world hates you. 14We know that we have passed from death to life, because we love the brethren. He who does not love his brother abides in death. 15Whoever hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him.  16By this we know love, because He laid down His life for us. And we also ought to lay down our lives for the brethren. 17But whoever has this world’s goods, and sees his brother in need, and shuts up his heart from him, how does the love of God abide in him?   18My little children, let us not love in word or in tongue, but in deed and in truth. 19And by this we know that we are of the truth, and shall assure our hearts before Him. 20For if our heart condemns us, God is greater than our heart, and knows all things. 21Beloved, if our heart does not condemn us, we have confidence toward God. 22And whatever we ask we receive from Him, because we keep His commandments and do those things that are pleasing in His sight23And this is His commandment: that we should believe on the name of His Son Jesus Christ and love one another, as He gave us commandment.   24Now he who keeps His commandments abides in Him, and He in him. And by this we know that He abides in us, by the Spirit whom He has given us.” (1 John 3: 1-24).

 

He who keeps His commandments abides in Him, and He in him.  Do you know what the sixth Commandment is?  13“You shall not murder.” (Ex.20:6).   Murder is to take innocent life. It has no justification, and nothing to do with religious dogma or worldly philosophy.  God does not, and cannot, reside in murderers, and if He is not in you, you are a mere walking corpse. 

No other man has been raised from the dead, and no other man has risen to heaven after resurrection.

Now have a look at the following lengthy statement from Jesus Christ and consider it carefully, for it has important implications about salvation. 

 

35And Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life. He who comes to Me shall never hunger, and he who believes in Me shall never thirst. 36But I said to you that you have seen Me and yet do not believe. 37All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will by no means cast out. 38For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. 39This is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all He has given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day. 40And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in Him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last day.”  41The Jews then complained about Him, because He said, “I am the bread which came down from heaven.” 42And they said, “Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How is it then that He says, ‘I have come down from heaven’?”

43Jesus therefore answered and said to them, “Do not murmur among yourselves. 44No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up at the last day45It is written in the prophets, ‘And they shall all be taught by God.’ Therefore everyone who has heard and learned from the Father comes to Me. 46Not that anyone has seen the Father, except He who is from God; He has seen the Father. 47Most assuredly, I say to you, he who believes in Me has everlasting life. 48I am the bread of life. 49Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and are dead. 50This is the bread which comes down from heaven, that one may eat of it and not die. 51I am the living bread which came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever; and the bread that I shall give is My flesh, which I shall give for the life of the world.”  52The Jews therefore quarrelled among themselves, saying, “How can this Man give us His flesh to eat?”  53Then Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you. 54Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. 55For My flesh is food indeed, and My blood is drink indeed. 56He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him. 57As the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, so he who feeds on Me will live because of Me. 58This is the bread which came down from heaven—not as your fathers ate the manna, and are dead. He who eats this bread will live forever.”  59These things He said in the synagogue as He taught in Capernaum.  60Therefore many of His disciples, when they heard this, said, “This is a hard saying; who can understand it?”

61When Jesus knew in Himself that His disciples complained about this, He said to them, “Does this offend you? 62What then if you should see the Son of Man ascend where He was before? 63It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing. The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life. 64But there are some of you who do not believe.” For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were who did not believe, and who would betray Him. 65And He said, “Therefore I have said to you that no one can come to Me unless it has been granted to him by My Father.”   66From that time many of His disciples went back and walked with Him no more. 67Then Jesus said to the twelve, “Do you also want to go away?”  68But Simon Peter answered Him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. 69Also we have come to believe and know that You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”

70Jesus answered them, “Did I not choose you, the twelve, and one of you is a devil?” 71He spoke of Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon, for it was he who would betray Him, being one of the twelve.” (John 6:35-70). 

 

What do these statements tell you? That people of all religions have an equal chance of salvation? No!  But that only those who are drawn by God to His Son, Jesus Christ, do.  And on what basis does God draw people to His Son? 

“The Lord looks down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there are any who understand, who seek God.” (Ps.14:2)

 

This is why children of men must become children of God. But what does God see when He looks down upon human beings?   “They have all turned aside, they have together become corrupt; There is none who does good, no, not one.”  (Ps. 14:3).

 

The reason none is good and all have turned aside is because they have all been born corrupt in the first place. 

 

5   “Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity,  and in sin my mother conceived me.

6    Behold, You desire truth in the inward parts, and in the hidden part You will make me to know wisdom.

7    Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean; Wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow.

8    Make me hear joy and gladness, That the bones You have broken may rejoice.

9    Hide Your face from my sins,  And blot out all my iniquities.

10   Create in me a clean heart, O God,  And renew a steadfast spirit within me.

11   Do not cast me away from Your presence,  And do not take Your Holy Spirit from me.” (Ps. 51:5-11).  

 

We often hear these days that love means accepting people as they are.  You could do no greater harm to people than not to correct them when you see them doing evil things.  If they mind, they are not worth having as friends. Such an attitude is not from God, but from the Devil, and you would not want to have fellowship with anyone who is not a child of God. 

We are yet to find anyone who says, please tell us where we are wrong so that we do not miss out on eternal life.  On the contrary, they are all fiercely defensive of their religion, even though they have never looked into it to make sure that its doctrines led to life and not to damnation. The Scriptures tell us that by the time of the end, all churches and religions would depart from the true path so much that they take arms against Jesus Christ when He comes to save them. 

 

11Now I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse. And He who sat on him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and makes war. 12His eyes were like a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns. He had a name written that no one knew except Himself. 13He was clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God. 14And the armies in heaven, clothed in £fine linen, white and clean, followed Him on white horses. 15Now out of His mouth goes a sharp sword, that with it He should strike the nations. And He Himself will rule them with a rod of iron. He Himself treads the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. 16And He has on His robe and on His thigh a name written:   KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.  17Then I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the birds that fly in the midst of heaven, “Come and gather together for the £supper of the great God, 18that you may eat the flesh of kings, the flesh of captains, the flesh of mighty men, the flesh of horses and of those who sit on them, and the flesh of all people, £free and slave, both small and great.”  19And I saw the beast, the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against Him who sat on the horse and against His army20Then the beast was captured, and with him the false prophet who worked signs in his presence, by which he deceived those who received the mark of the beast and those who worshiped his image. These two were cast alive into the lake of fire burning with brimstone. 21And the rest were killed with the sword which proceeded from the mouth of Him who sat on the horse. And all the birds were filled with their flesh.” (Rev.19:1-21). 

 

This is the purpose of the crisscrossing of the world by certain religious leaders these days: not to prepare the world to receive Jesus Christ with open arms, but to take up arms against Him.  They do that in the name of the so-called ‘ecumenical movement’.  

 

 

 

                       Why Apostle Peter Could Not

Have Been the First Pope Of Rome

 

It is a long tradition in the Catholic Church that Apostle Peter was its first Pope.  Many historians however disagree with it, pointing out that the first list of Popes was compiled more than a century and a half later.   

 

“Power and the glory of papal struggles”   “Historians disagree about the exact number of pontiffs and much else concerning the papacy.  Although the Catholic Church claims an unbroken line of popes going back to the apostle Peter, tracing it is like following a meandering river back to the source.  For example, the Vatican’s pontifical yearbook for 1961 stripped Pope Stephen II from the list of pontiffs on the grounds that although he had been properly elected in 752, he died before he could be crowned.  But the last two popes abolished coronations, so perhaps it is time for Stephen to be reinstated.   The first list of popes was compiled in 180 by the historian Iranaeus of Lyons, who listed all the elders who had headed the Church in Rome since the time of the apostles Peter and Paul.  

Like most early historians, he did not include Peter. The first leader of the Christian community, according to him, was Linus followed by Anacleus, Clement, Evaristus and Alexander. 

No one knew who the next in line was, so Iranaeus called him Sixtus – six. There have so far been five popes with that name, so it is a fair bet that the next pontiff will not be called Sixtus VI.”   Popes have been changing their names as far back as the sixth century. But with monikers like Poppo of Brixen, Pietro Buccaporca (pig’s snout) and Maurice Burdanus (the donkey), it is easy to understand why.   This has increased the confusion and discrepancy in an historical record strewn with anti-popes who were not always bad popes and popes who were not always holy . . .   Electing a pope used to be a Spartan affair. It took 18 prelates meetings in Viterbo three years to agree on Pope Gregory X, which did in 1271.  This was only after citizens tore off the roof of the palace where they were residing to supposedly help the Holy Spirit reach the cardinals.  Gregory then decreed that cardinals should be locked up in future conclaves, with their rations systematically reduced during prolonged elections . . .  But however stressful modern papal elections, they are nothing compared with the drama of the early centuries of Christianity, when popes struggles to establish their power as the Roman empire was collapsing and threats abounded from other cultures and religions.  Pontiffs became absolute monarchs, with their own army, administrations and lands, until other European kings re-asserted their own rights, shrinking the papacy’s power and forcing it to revert to its age-old spiritual role.”  (The Daily Telegraph, April 18, 2005).    

 

The Catholic Encyclopedia however, an ‘authoritative’ source in these matters, gives the following lists of Popes:

 

1.     St. Peter (32-67)                                                                   18. St. Pontain (230-35)

2.     St. Linus (67-76)                                                                   19. St. Anterus (235-36)

3.     St. Anacletus (Cletus) (76-88)                                              20. St. Fabian ((236-50)

4.     St. Clement I (88-97)                                                             21. St. Cornelius (251-53)

5.     St. Evaristus (97-105)                                                           22. St. Lucius I (253-54)

6.     St. Alexander I (105-115)                                                     23. St. Stephan I (254-57)

7.     St. Sixtus I (115-125) -- also called Xystus I                        24. St. Sixtus II (257-58)

8.     St. Telesphorus (125-136)                                                    25. St. Dionysius (260-68)

9.     St. Hyginus (136-140)                                                           26. St. Felix I (269-74)

10.  St. Pius I (140-155)                                                               27. St. Eutychian (275-83)

11.  St. Anicetus (155-166)                                                         28. St. Caius (283-296) – also called Gaius

12.  St. Soter (166-175)                                                               29. St. Marcellinus (296–304)

13.  St. Eleutherius (175-189)                                                      30. St. Marcellus I (308-309)

14.  St. Victor I (189-199)                                                            31. St. Eusebius (309 or 310)

15.  St. Zephyrinus (199-217)                                                     32. St. Miltiades (311-14)

16.  St. Callistus I (217-22)                                                           33. St. Sylvester I (314-35)

17.  St. Urban I (222-30)                                                              34. St. Marcus (336) 

 

We stopped at Pope 34 – St. Marcus – for a very important reason, namely that it takes us past the Council of Nicaea which took place in the year 325.  At that Council, Christianity was supposed to have become officially the religion of the Roman Empire.  What happened at that Council instead was that true Christianity was abolished and a fake one set up.  The new Christianity had almost nothing in common with the Christianity of the apostles and the early Churches that they set up: not in doctrines, not in beliefs, not in practices, and not in Holy Days.   

We have often discussed this topic in the past, and those who wish to look at it again can begin with The Christian Herald No 11.  Now however, we want to concentrate on the one item that the Catholic Church claims as its bona fides – the mission that Jesus Christ gave to Apostle Peter which was supposed to have been passed on to all Popes after him.     

 

“13When Jesus came into the region of Caesarea Philippi, He asked His disciples, saying, “Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am?”  14So they said, “Some say John the Baptist, some Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.”

15He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?”  16Simon Peter answered and said, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”

17Jesus answered and said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. 18And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. 19And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” (Mat. 16:13-19).

 

A mighty mission and great empowerment Jesus Christ gave to His leading Apostle.

Now it should be easy to prove that Apostle Peter was the first head of the Catholic Church, because that was a very advanced period for its time and left behind large volumes of writings – historical, religious, literary, military, and just about any other subject. It is from this time also that we have the New Testament.  And yet, there is not a single piece of writing from that period that places Apostle Peter at the head of the Catholic Church, or indeed anywhere near Rome.  

Let us leave aside the fact that historians cannot locate any document which would confirm that Apostle Peter was the first Pope in Rome, and look at the list provided by the Catholic Encyclopedia which has Peter as its first Pope. 

First of all, we must point out that we do not address Peter as ‘Saint’ but as ‘Apostle’, because the term ‘Saint’ is never used in the Bible as an honorific title, but merely as a descriptive term of membership in the Churches of God.  The title ‘Apostle’ on the other hand was specifically given by Jesus Christ to a limited number of disciples who would hold positions of kings and priests under Him in the Kingdom of God.  (For further details on this topic, see TCH No 1).   When spoken in general terms, it is ‘apostle’, but when applied to a specific person, it is capitalized, just as one does with the term ‘doctor’.  

And while we are talking about titles, Apostle Peter would never have taken upon himself the title of ‘Father’ used these days by Catholic prelates, let alone ‘Holy Father’ so loved by its Popes. Why not? Because he heard Jesus Christ personally saying, “9Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One is your Father, He who is in heaven.” (Mat.23:9). 

One should never forget also that the Third Commandment says, “You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain, for the LORD will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain.” (Ex.20:7).  If what the Popes are doing is not taking the name of the God in vain, what is it?  The title “Holy Father’ belongs to God and to Him alone, and that is why any man who presumes to call himself by that tile commits an unpardonable blasphemy. The title ‘Holy Father’ is found only once in the Bible, and it was used by Jesus Christ to address His Father in heaven. 

 

9“I pray for them. I do not pray for the world but for those whom You have given Me, for they are Yours. 10And all Mine are Yours, and Yours are Mine, and I am glorified in them. 11Now I am no longer in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to You.

Holy Father, keep through Your name those whom You have given Me, that they may be one as We are.” (John 17:9-11).  

 

By apportioning for themselves the title of ‘Holy Father’, the Popes took the role of God, and made it sound as if Jesus Christ would have prayed to them. Apostle Peter would never have done that.      

The Catholic encyclopedia says that Apostle Peter took his position of Pope in the year 32, and held it until the year 67.  It does not tell us where it got that information from, but we know that it did not get it from the Bible, because the Bible proves the very opposite – that Apostle Peter was never in Rome, during that period or any other period. 

It also means that Peter became Pope while Jesus Christ was still on this earth before He was even crucified. 

Why then does the Catholic Encyclopedia list Peter as Pope in the year 32?  Because it knows that it cannot prove that he went to Rome in any other year and because the Scriptures prove that in the following years it was Paul who went to Rome not Peter! Catholic luminaries find it convenient to say that Peter became their Pope the moment Jesus Christ gave him that mission. The fact that it would be more than a year before Peter set up the first Church of God in Jerusalem, let alone Rome, does not bother them.  They just hope that no one will take note of their sleight of hand.   

In the book of Acts, we find the following statement: “11But the following night the Lord stood by him and said, “Be of good cheer, Paul; for as you have testified for Me in Jerusalem, so you must also bear witness at Rome.” (Acts 23:11). 

That was the year 60 AD, some 28 years after Peter was supposed to have taken his position as Pope in Rome. 

Now if Peter was already in Rome, why would Jesus Christ want Paul to be His witness in that city as he was in Jerusalem?  Apostle Peter did more witnessing in Jerusalem than did Apostle Paul.  He had set up the first Church of God there, suffered imprisonment and persecution, and had he not fled that city in a hurry, he would have lost his life there as well.  And that was long before Paul was even converted to Christianity.  So if Jesus Christ wanted one who had witnessed Him in Jerusalem to do the same in Rome, He would have chosen Peter, but Peter was no longer available because he had gone to witness Jesus to the ‘pilgrims of the dispersion’, as we shall see.  Also, if Peter had already been Pope in Rome, there would have been no need for Paul to be Jesus’ witness there as he was in Jerusalem, for that would have meant undermining Peter’s work.  But we know that the Holy Spirit did not allow them to build on each other’s foundation.

 

“”20And so I have made it my aim to preach the gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should build on another man’s foundation21but as it is written:  “To whom He was not announced, they shall see; And those who have not heard shall understand.”

22For this reason I also have been much hindered from coming to you. 23But now no longer having a place in these parts, and having a great desire these many years to come to you, 24whenever I journey to Spain,  I shall come to you.” (Rom. 15:20-24).

 

Apostle Paul was hindered at first from going to Rome because he had not yet finished his job in Asia Minor and Greece.  The Holy Spirit knew that he would not come back after he went to Rome. 

Now clearly if Apostle Peter had already laid the foundation of the Church of God in Rome, Apostle Paul would not have been allowed to build another foundation or to build on the foundation laid by Apostle Peter. So contrary to what the Catholic encyclopedia says, in the year 60 AD, when the epistle to the Romans was written, Apostle Peter was not in Rome.

In the conclusion of that epistle, Apostle Paul greeted and named just about every Christian in that city.  Apostle Peter was not among them.  Notice:

 

“1I commend to you Phoebe our sister, who is a servant of the church in Cenchrea, 2that you may receive her in the Lord in a manner worthy of the saints, and assist her in whatever business she has need of you; for indeed she has been a helper of many and of myself also.  3Greet Priscilla and Aquila, my fellow workers in Christ Jesus, 4who risked their own necks for my life, to whom not only I give thanks, but also all the churches of the Gentiles. 5Likewise greet the church that is in their house.  Greet my beloved Epaenetus, who is the firstfruits of Achaia to Christ. 6Greet Mary, who labored much for us. 7Greet Andronicus and Junia, my countrymen and my fellow prisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me.  8Greet Amplias, my beloved in the Lord. 9Greet Urbanus, our fellow worker in Christ, and Stachys, my beloved. 10Greet Apelles, approved in Christ. Greet those who are of the household of Aristobulus. 11Greet Herodion, my countryman. Greet those who are of the household of Narcissus who are in the Lord.  12Greet Tryphena and Tryphosa, who have labored in the Lord. Greet the beloved Persis, who labored much in the Lord. 13Greet Rufus, chosen in the Lord, and his mother and mine. 14Greet Asyncritus, Phlegon, Hermas, Patrobas, Hermes, and the brethren who are with them. 15Greet Philologus and Julia, Nereus and his sister, and Olympas, and all the saints who are with them.  16Greet one another with a holy kiss. The churches of Christ greet you.

17Now I urge you, brethren, note those who cause divisions and offenses, contrary to the doctrine which you learned, and avoid them. 18For those who are such do not serve our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly, and by smooth words and flattering speech deceive the hearts of the simple. 19For your obedience has become known to all. Therefore I am glad on your behalf; but I want you to be wise in what is good, and simple concerning evil. 20And the God of peace will crush Satan under your feet shortly.

The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Amen. (Rom.16:1-20).

  

Apostle Paul is telling the “brethren” of Rome to note those who cause divisions and offences among them and avoid them.  Now is it conceivable that Apostle Paul would have done that if Apostle Peter was their Pope?  Not a mention of Peter anywhere in this lengthy epistle.  And something else:  Paul mentions Priscilla and Aquila and “the church that is in their house”.  They were not meeting in palaces or some other great buildings, but in the people’s houses.  Rome however, had a mighty religious leader, who lived luxuriously in great palaces, to whom the whole of the Empire paid obeisance.  Who was that leader? Not Apostle Peter to be sure, but one called Pontifex Maximus, or the Pontiff. Here are excerpts from a couple of articles, one from Wikipedia and another from Google about the Roman religion of that time. 

 

“The Pontifex Maximus was the high priest of the Ancient Roman College of Pontiffs. This was the most important position in the Ancient Roman religion, open only to patricians, until 254 BC, when a plebeian first occupied this post. A distinctly religious office under the early Roman Republic, it gradually became politicized until, beginning with Augustus, it was subsumed into the Imperial office. It was last held by the Christian Roman Emperor Gratian until the title passed over to the Bishop of Rome.

Today, "Pontifex Maximus" is one of the titles of the Bishop of Rome as Pope of the Catholic Church. As a papal title, the translation Supreme Pontiff is customary when writing in English, in which the Latin term Pontifex Maximus refers to the former pagan Roman post. But Latin is still the official language of the Catholic Church and of the Vatican, and the Latin form Pontifex Maximus is still used in reference to the Pope when writing or speaking in that language. The title appears regularly on buildings, monuments and coins (among other things) dedicated by or otherwise made during each specific pontificate.”

The Collegium Pontificum or College of Pontiffs was the most important priesthood of ancient Rome. The foundation of this sacred college is attributed to the second king of Rome, Numa Pompilius. It is safe to say that the collegium was tasked to act as advisers of the rex (king) in all matters of religion. The collegium was headed by the pontifex maximus and all the pontifices held their office for life. Prior to its institution, all religious and administrative functions and powers were naturally exercised by the king. Very little is known about this period of Roman history regarding the pontiffs as the main historical sources are lost and some of the events from this period are regarded as semi-legendary or mythical. Most of the records of ancient Rome were destroyed when it was sacked by the Gauls in 390 BC. Accounts from this early period come from excerpts of writings made during the Republican Period.”

 

“The pontifex maximus was not a real magistrate: he did not serve for a fixed period but for life, and he remained, officially, a citizen. As the title suggests, the pontifex maximus was 'the greatest' or chairman of the college of the pontifices, 'priests'. They were responsible for the Roman state cult as a whole and for several cults in particular, viz. the cults that had no priestly college of their own (such as the augures, the decemviri sacris faciundis and the fetiales).   The number of pontifices continued to grow. There were originally five 'real' pontifices, after the Lex Ogulnia (300/299 BCE) nine, after Sulla fifteen, and after Julius Caesar sixteen. Another member was the rex sacrorum ('king of the sacrifices') who performed the religious acts that the king had usually done. There were three (later 15) flamines, special priests for the main gods, and there were three mysterious pontifices minores. Finally, the high priest was also responsible for the eighteen priestesses of the goddess Vesta. This may have been his most important duty, and it comes as no surprise that the residence of the pontifex maximus, the domus publica, was next to the monastery of these women.

The main task of the pontifices was to maintain the pax deorum, the 'peace with the gods'. To obtain this goal, they gave advise to the magistrates, interpreted the omens, controlled the calendar and oversaw funerals. The pontifex maximus was responsible for a large collection of omens (annales maximi); every year, he wrote down the celestial and other signs, and added the events that had followed the omens, so that future generation would be able to better understand the divine will.

Until the Lex Ogulnia, all pontifices were patricians; this law introduced the possibility that plebeians were to be pontifex as well. The pontifex maximus was elected by the comitia tributa, an assembly of the people that was divided into voting districts. After 104 BCE, the ordinary pontifices were also elected - until then, they had been coopted.

Julius Caesar was elected pontifex maximus in 63 BCE and kept the office until his death. The house where he spent the night before he was killed, was the domus publica. After his death, Marcus Aemilius Lepidus became pontifex maximus (44-12 BCE); when he died, the emperor Augustus became responsible for the state cult. He also put an end to the election of the pontifices. From then on, a position in the college of pontifices was a sign of special imperial favor, comparable to a decoration in our age.

The word pontifex is sometimes explained as 'bridge builder', but is in fact related to the Etruscan word pont, 'road', and means something like 'preparer of the road'. The pope still calls himself pontifex maximus.  Because the pontifex maximus was not a real magistrate, he was not allowed to wear the toga with the purple border. However, he could be recognized by the iron knife (secespita).

In 381, the Roman emperor Gratian was the first to decline to use the title of pontifex maximus. It was accepted by the pope.”  

 

We can deduct a few points from these articles. 

1. The title ‘Pontifex Maximus’ had its origins in Rome’s pagan past.  Would Apostle Peter have accepted a pagan title for himself?  And if he would not, why have the later Popes accepted it? They did so for one reason: they had always considered it to be their title by right. Pontifex Maximus meant ‘high priest’, which the emperors never were.  The emperors had usurped it for a while, for the prestige and honor which it gave them, but they could not sustain that claim and in the end they gave it back to its rightful owners.  The Popes accepted it unhesitatingly, even though it had nothing to do with the religion of Jesus Christ and everything to do with Rome’s ancient pagan past.        

2. Roman religious establishment was an extraordinarily complex and hierarchical one.  On what basis would that establishment have accepted an alien as its leader?  Remember, Apostle Paul found only a handful of Christians in Rome, and none on of them was of a renowned name. 

3. Although the title ‘Pontifex Maximus’ had been taken over by the emperors, Roman religious leaders still retained the titles of  rex sacrorum (sacred or divine king), and  rex sacrificulum ('king of the sacrifices').  These titles speak for themselves. The first assumed that the Pontiffs’ position was of divine origin, while the second made them kings of sacrifices. Remember, they even sacrificed humans in their ceremonial games in those days.  All their public ceremonies had the blessing of the emperor and the religious leader.   The gladiators used to say to their leader: ‘those who are about to die salute you’, and the Coliseum would erupt in applause and stand in awe.  The emperors took that honor upon themselves for a while, but long before and after them that honour belonged to the Roman religious leaders.     

On what basis then would a foreigner like Peter have been elevated to that supreme religious position?  And would he have accepted it? It would have put him in opposition to Jesus Christ who forbade His followers to take such honorific titles.     

4. The Roman religious leader was also “responsible for the eighteen priestesses of the goddess Vesta”.  Would Apostle Peter have accepted to be in charge of eighteen priestesses of the goddess Vesta?  In the first Churches of God, there were no monks and no nuns.  Of the main apostles, only Paul was celibate and wile he told his followers that it would be good for them all to be like him, he made no doctrine about it.  Apostle Peter, on the other hand, was married even before he was called to be a disciple of Jesus Christ.  In his first epistle, written from Babylon, he mentioned his wife and a son.  “13She who is in Babylon, elect together with you, greets you; and so does Mark my son. 14Greet one another with a kiss of love.” (1 Peter 5:13).  

This epistle is dated in the year 60. What was Peter doing in Babylon if he was Pope of the Roman Church? 

5. The Roman religious leader was also responsible for reading omens.  And how did the Romans do that?  By looking at the entrails of animals: chicken, lambs, pigs, etc...  Can one imagine an apostle of Jesus Christ doing such a thing?  

 

It is interesting to note that just as Paul sent an epistle to the Romans in which he named the Christians of that city among whom Peter did not appear, he also sent an epistle from Rome to the Colossians in which he again listed the Christians of that city among whom Peter once again did not appear. 

 

“7Tychicus, a beloved brother, faithful minister, and fellow servant in the Lord, will tell you all the news about me. 8I am sending him to you for this very purpose, that he may know your circumstances and comfort your hearts, 9with Onesimus, a faithful and beloved brother, who is one of you. They will make known to you all things which are happening here.

10Aristarchus my fellow prisoner greets you, with Mark the cousin of Barnabas (about whom you received instructions: if he comes to you, welcome him), 11and Jesus who is called Justus. These are my only fellow workers for the kingdom of God who are of the circumcision; they have proved to be a comfort to me.  12Epaphras, who is one of you, a bondservant of Christ, greets you, always laboring fervently for you in prayers, that you may stand perfect and complete in all the will of God. 13For I bear him witness that he has a great zeal for you, and those who are in Laodicea, and those in Hierapolis14Luke the beloved physician and Demas greet you. 15Greet the brethren who are in Laodicea, and Nymphas and the church that is in £his house.

16Now when this epistle is read among you, see that it is read also in the church of the Laodiceans, and that you likewise read the epistle from Laodicea17And say to Archippus, “Take heed to the ministry which you have received in the Lord, that you may fulfil it.”

18This salutation by my own hand—Paul. Remember my chains. Grace be with you. Amen.” (Col. 4:7-18).

 

The epistle to the Colossians was written in the year 64, four years after the epistle to the Romans.  Yet in this time the Church of Rome instead of growing had diminished.  None of the Christians mentioned din the first epistle appear in the second.  And of course, just as in the epistle to the Romans, the Colossian epistle does not mention Peter.  So in the year 64, just three years before he was supposed to have been martyred in that city, Apostle Peter still had not appeared in Rome.  Where does that leave the Catholic claim that Peter was its Pope from the year 32 to the year 67?

Now have a look at this: 

 

“After these things Paul departed from Athens and went to Corinth2And he found a certain Jew named Aquila, born in Pontus, who had recently come from Italy with his wife Priscilla (because Claudius had commanded all the Jews to depart from Rome); and he came to them. 3So, because he was of the same trade, he stayed with them and worked; for by occupation they were tentmakers. 4And he reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded both Jews and Greeks.”  (Acts 18:1-4). 

 

This chapter of the book of Acts, describes events of the year 54 AD.  At that time, Christians had not yet been distinguished from the Jews.  In that year, Claudius had commanded all the Jews to depart from Rome, hence all the Christians.  What happened to Peter if he was already the Pope of the Church of Rome?

And if you want still more proof that Peter never went to Rome, notice what the Jews told Paul when he went there.     

 

“16Now when we came to Rome, the centurion delivered the prisoners to the captain of the guard; but Paul was permitted to dwell by himself with the soldier who guarded him.

17And it came to pass after three days that Paul called the leaders of the Jews together. So when they had come together, he said to them: “Men and brethren, though I have done nothing against our people or the customs of our fathers, yet I was delivered as a prisoner from Jerusalem into the hands of the Romans, 18who, when they had examined me, wanted to let me go, because there was no cause for putting me to death. 19But when the Jews spoke against it, I was compelled to appeal to Caesar, not that I had anything of which to accuse my nation. 20For this reason therefore I have called for you, to see you and speak with you, because for the hope of Israel I am bound with this chain.”   21Then they said to him, “We neither received letters from Judea concerning you, nor have any of the brethren who came reported or spoken any evil of you. 22But we desire to hear from you what you think; for concerning this sect, we know that it is spoken against everywhere.”  23So when they had appointed him a day, many came to him at his lodging, to whom he explained and solemnly testified of the kingdom of God, persuading them concerning Jesus from both the Law of Moses and the Prophets, from morning till evening. 24And some were persuaded by the things which were spoken, and some disbelieved. 25So when they did not agree among themselves, they departed after Paul had said one word: “The Holy Spirit spoke rightly through Isaiah the prophet to our fathers, 26saying,

    ‘Go to this people and say:  “Hearing you will hear, and shall not understand;  And seeing you will see, and not perceive;

27 For the hearts of this people have grown dull.  Their ears are hard of hearing,  And their eyes they have closed, Lest they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, Lest they should understand with their hearts and turn, So that I should heal them.”’

28“Therefore let it be known to you that the salvation of God has been sent to the Gentiles, and they will hear it!” 29And when he had said these words, the Jews departed and had a great dispute among themselves.  30Then Paul dwelt two whole years in his own rented house, and received all who came to him, 31preaching the kingdom of God and teaching the things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ with all confidence, no one forbidding him.” (Acts 28:16-31). 

 

If Peter had been in Rome before that time, he was an extraordinarily ineffective preacher, for those Jews knew nothing abut this ‘sect’ except that was ‘spoken against everywhere’.  But Jesus Christ did not choose Peter to be His chief apostle for nothing. He was courageous, gifted and a good orator.  And since he was the Apostle to the circumcision – to the Jews in other words – it would have been inconceivable that he would go to Rome and not speak to the Jews at all.    

When Paul was tried in Rome, he said that all people forsook him. 

 

“1I charge you therefore before God and the Lord Jesus Christ, who will judge the living and the dead at His appearing and His kingdom: 2Preach the word! Be ready in season and out of season. Convince, rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering and teaching. 3For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; 4and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables. 5But you be watchful in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, fulfil your ministry.

6For I am already being poured out as a drink offering, and the time of my departure is at hand. 7I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith. 8Finally, there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will give to me on that Day, and not to me only but also to all who have loved His appearing.

9Be diligent to come to me quickly; 10for Demas has forsaken me, having loved this present world, and has departed for Thessalonica—Crescens for Galatia, Titus for Dalmatia11Only Luke is with me. Get Mark and bring him with you, for he is useful to me for ministry. 12And Tychicus I have sent to Ephesus13Bring the cloak that I left with Carpus at Troas when you come—and the books, especially the parchments. 14Alexander the coppersmith did me much harm. May the Lord repay him according to his works. 15You also must beware of him, for he has greatly resisted our words.  16At my first defense no one stood with me, but all forsook me. May it not be charged against them.  17But the Lord stood with me and strengthened me, so that the message might be preached fully through me, and that all the Gentiles might hear. Also I was delivered out of the mouth of the lion. 18And the Lord will deliver me from every evil work and preserve me for His heavenly kingdom. To Him be glory forever and ever. Amen!

 

Would Apostle Peter have abandoned Paul also if he were in Rome at that time?  You can be absolutely sure that he would never have done that. 

After setting up the first Church in Jerusalem, the Holy Spirit led Peter to convert the first Gentiles.  But after baptising and granting them the Holy Spirit, he went over to preach to the lost tribes of the house of Israel. 

 

“1Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the pilgrims of the Dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, 2elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, in sanctification of the Spirit, for obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ:  Grace to you and peace be multiplied.”  (1 Peter 1:2).

 

The pilgrims of the dispersion were the scattered Israelites and Jews who fled from the conquering armies of the Assyrians and Babylonians.  Later, Apostle Peter went to Babylon because that is where the tribes of Judah were originally taken captive. This is another reason why Apostle Peter could not have gone to Rome.  The Jews of Rome had gone there for commercial reasons, and there would not have been enough of them to warrant his presence there, especially after Caludius had ordered them to leave the city.  Rome being the leading Gentile city of that time, it was Paul role to lay the foundation for a Church of God in that city.     

The question must be asked: if there is so much proof that Apostle Paul went to Rome, and none that Apostle Peter was its first Pope, why did the Catholic Church not list Paul as its first Pope and not Peter? 

Because it needed Jesus’ mission to Apostle Peter to conquer the world, not Paul’s mission to just convert it.   

 

“18And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. 19And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” (Mat. 16:18-19). 

 

The Vatican had to lie in order to apportion Peter’s authority.  It could do so only after sufficient time had passed to wipe out earlier memories and records, and set up a fallacious list of Popes.  Once it did that, it not only conquered the world, but committed unspeakable atrocities in the name of Jesus Christ against His very followers.   

 

 

 

 

                        Why Capital Punishment Will Never

               Be Abolished In the Eyes of God

 

When Saddam Hussein was judged for the myriad of crimes that he committed against the Iraqi and other peoples, the Vatican was the first to argue that he should not receive the death penalty.  And when he did receive it, they did their best to prevent it from being carried out.    

 

Clemency call for Saddam   “AUSTRALIAN social justice advocates have supported a Vatican call for clemency for former Iraqi president, Saddam Hussein.   The former dictator was sentenced to hang by a Baghdad court on Sunday after being found guilty of crimes against humanity.   Director of the Uniya Jesuit Social Justice Centre, Mary Bryant, has opposed the sentence, saying “all life is sacred”.   “All people are created in the image and likeness of God and hence no-one has the right, no matter what the justification, to take away the life that has been given,” she said.  “Catholics have a social and moral responsibility to advocate for the sacredness of life.”

“We must be ready to advocate and support the sacredness of life for all human beings no matter what the challenges are or the obstacles we face.”  The greatest challenge in life is offering forgiveness to those who are least deserving, she says.” (Victoria Brooks, The DailyTelegraph, Nov. 12, 2007). 

 

Now if all people are created in the image and likeness of God, who can argue against that?  God does! 

 

5Surely for your lifeblood I will demand a reckoning; from the hand of every beast I will require it, and from the hand of man. From the hand of every man’s brother I will require the life of man.  6Whoever sheds man’s blood, by man his blood shall be shed; For in the image of God  He made man.”  (Gen. 9:5-6). 

 

Did you get it?  God says that murderers must pay with their life because they have taken life which was made in the image of God, while the Catholic Church says that murderers should not pay with their life because they are made in the image of God. 

Now who do you think is right, God or the Catholic Church?  Isn’t it amazing how many millions, even billions, of people believe the Catholic Church and how few believe the Scriptures – the very Word of God?

Now if murderers are not made in the image of God, in whose image are they made?  Herein lays a great mystery, for although we may all look the same on the outside, we are not the same on the inside.  What makes us look like God is not our outside appearance, but our inward character.  Murderers do not look like God on the inside, and that is why they must pay with their life for taking the life of people who have God’s character. In whose image are murderers made then?  In the image of their father – the Devil! 

 

39They answered and said to Him, “Abraham is our father.”  Jesus said to them, “If you were Abraham’s children, you would do the works of Abraham. 40But now you seek to kill Me, a Man who has told you the truth which I heard from God. Abraham did not do this. 41You do the deeds of your father.”  Then they said to Him, “We were not born of fornication; we have one Father—God.”

42Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I proceeded forth and came from God; nor have I come of Myself, but He sent Me. 43Why do you not understand My speech? Because you are not able to listen to My word. 44You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it. 45But because I tell the truth, you do not believe Me. 46Which of you convicts Me of sin? And if I tell the truth, why do you not believe Me? 47He who is of God hears God’s words; therefore you do not hear, because you are not of God.”

48Then the Jews answered and said to Him, “Do we not say rightly that You are a Samaritan and have a demon?” (John 8: 39-48).

 

The children of the Devil, who bore his image character wise, accused Jesus Christ of being demon possessed.  Isn’t this how things are in the world these days too?  Jesus Christ performed miracles and spoke the truth of God, and yet they accused Him of being demon possessed.  They denied that they were planning to kill Jesus Christ, and what did they do in the end?  They crucified Him!  And for what reason?  That He spoke in the name of God, and made Himself the Son of God.  

 

31“Then the Jews took up stones again to stone Him. 32Jesus answered them, “Many good works I have shown you from My Father. For which of those works do you stone Me?”   33The Jews answered Him, saying, “For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy, and because You, being a Man, make Yourself God.”   34Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your law, ‘I said, “You are gods”’35If He called them gods, to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture cannot be broken), 36do you say of Him whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world, ‘You are blaspheming,’ because I said, ‘I am the Son of God’? 37If I do not do the works of My Father, do not believe Me; 38but if I do, though you do not believe Me, believe the works, that you may know and believe that the Father is in Me, and I in Him.” 39Therefore they sought again to seize Him, but He escaped out of their hand.” (John 10:31-39).

 

Who do you think was made in the image of God, Jesus Christ or His murderers?  The Vatican would say that both He and they, but Jesus Christ said that they were children of the Devil therefore they could not have been made in the image of God.  Murderers are never made in the image of God, and that is why the death penalty for those who take the life of people who are made in the image of God will never be abolished. Not now, nor ever!   

For ordinary people to become children of God, to be made in His image in other words, they must repent of their evil deeds.  But do you think the Jews have ever repented of their deed?  Many years ago, when I was living in Canada, I was walking with a converted Jew through a shopping plaza in Toronto in which there were a lot of Jewish shops.  At one time, I said something about Jesus Christ.  Upon hearing that name, my companion quickly made a sign to me to keep quiet and not mention that name in that place.  I was stunned by his reaction. Surely the Jews would not be so bent against Jesus Christ as to be offended in what was then a Christian nation by someone mentioning that name in passing.

He assured me that they would be, especially so since we went there to buy unleavened bread for the Passover. 

By the way, I said Canada was then a Christian nation, because in the meantime it has changed its religion to homosexuality.  In that country, homosexuals get “married”, lampoon, ridicule, and say anything they want about Christians, but heaven help him who says anything negative about homosexuals. And churches have supported that legislation.      

Talking about homosexuals, do you think they are made in the image of God?  The Vatican would argue ‘yes’, for it “profoundly respects them”, but what do the Scriptures say? 

 

18“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. 20For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.

24Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonour their bodies among themselves, 25who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

26For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.

28And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29being filled with all unrighteousness,  sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, 30backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving,  unforgiving, unmerciful; 32who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.” (Rom.1:18-32).

 

“Those who practice such things are deserving of death”.  And this is not the Old Testament, but the New Testament. And yet what has the Vatican done with its myriad of priests who have abused children in this manner?  It moved them around from parish to parish so that they could abuse more children.

For millennia, the Catholic Church burned and killed people whose only ‘crime’ was to posses a Bible, let alone obey it, yet now it argues that murderers and homosexuals must not receive the death penalty because they are made in the image of God, in exact opposition to what God says. In so doing, it is trying to escape the consequences of its own sins.       

Can you see now why this institution takes an opposite position to God on the mater of capital punishment?

Jesus Christ said that He did not come to destroy the law – the Ten Commandments – but to fulfil them.

 

17“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfil. 18For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled. 19Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20For I say to you, that unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven.” (Mat.5:17-20).

 

Why then did He forgive the woman that was caught in adultery?  Because she repented on the spot, and because her captors were hypocrites!  Where was the man with whom she committed adultery?  The law required that they both be put to death.  The truth is that they did not bring her to Jesus because they necessarily wanted her dead, but because they wanted to catch Him speaking or acting against the Law of Moses. 

Jesus was faced with a situation that required the Wisdom of Solomon.  Since He was greater than Solomon (Mat.12:42), He gave them an answer that they did not expect.  Then He did not look in their eyes to challenge them, but stooped down and wrote on the ground, giving them the chance to slip away quietly, which they did. 

The woman saw death in her face. When her accusers left and she was alone, she could have run for her life too, but instead she stood there motionless in front of Jesus Christ. Only God knows what was going on in her mind at that time.

 

“When Jesus had raised Himself up and saw no one but the woman, He said to her, “Woman, where are those accusers of yours? Has no one condemned you?” She said, “No one, Lord.”  And Jesus said to her, “Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more.” (John 8:10-11).

 

This example is often used by people who say that there is no death penalty in Christianity and plead for its abolition all over the world.  But let us consider it in the context of both the Old and New Testaments. 

First of all, one must never forget that Jesus Christ said He came to fulfil the law not to destroy it. (Mat.5:17).

Second, the Scriptures tell us that God does not change. (Mal.3:6).  Therefore His eternal laws do not change either.

Third, it was the dietary and sacrificial laws that were changed in the New Testament. These were of a temporary nature, being designed to bring us to Christ and no further  (Gal.3:24).

Fourth, Jesus Christ did not come to be a judge of Israel (Luke 12:14).  Those who brought the woman to Him knew this, but instead of taking her to those who were judges of such matters, took her to Him so that they might catch Him.  Instead, He caught them in their hypocrisy!   He could have said, ‘I have not been sent to be a judge of Israel, so go to those who are judges, but had He said that, most likely He would have condemned her to death.  Clearly, He did not want that and wanted to save her life. 

Fifth, in the Bible, sexual sins are not unforgivable, as are blasphemies against the Holy Spirit. God often used sexual misdemeanour to refresh the blood line of His kings.  Abraham, Jacob, Judah, and David are some of the examples of people who were involved in sexual acts that were not kosher under the law. But they were all forgiven because they repented of them when brought to their attention and did not commit them again.

Apostle John said that some sins lead to death, while others do not.

 

“16If anyone sees his brother sinning a sin which does not lead to death, he will ask, and He will give him life for those who commit sin not leading to death. There is sin leading to death. I do not say that he should pray about that. 17All unrighteousness is sin, and there is sin not leading to death.  18We know that whoever is born of God does not sin; but he who has been born of God keeps himself, and the wicked one does not touch him.  19We know that we are of God, and the whole world lies under the sway of the wicked one.  20And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us an understanding, that we may know Him who is true; and we are in Him who is true, in His Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God and eternal life. 21Little children, keep yourselves from idols. ” (1John 5:16-21). 

 

Whoever is born of God does not sin – does not commit murder.  These are the people that are made in the image of God, not murderers who are born in the image of their father the Devil.  The fact that physically speaking they all look the same does not matter. What matters is their character, and in that they could not be further apart.  Here is the  difference.

 

25“Husbands love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her, 26that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, 27that He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish28So husbands ought to love their own wives as their own bodies; he who loves his wife loves himself. 29For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as the Lord does the church. 30For we are members of His body, of His flesh and of His bones. 31“For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” 32This is a great mystery, but I speak concerning Christ and the church. 33Nevertheless let each one of you in particular so love his own wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband.” Eph. 5:25-33).

 

Jesus Christ is preparing a bride for Himself “without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but holy and without blemish”.  Physically speaking, members of His Church – His bride – look the same as any other human being. Spiritually speaking however, they are worlds apart.  Some are black on the inside, being children of darkness, while the other are shinning on the inside, being children of light.

 

8“For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Walk as children of light 9(for the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness, righteousness, and truth), 10finding out what is acceptable to the Lord. 11And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them. 12For it is shameful even to speak of those things which are done by them in secret. 13But all things that are exposed are made manifest by the light, for whatever makes manifest is light. 14Therefore He says:  “Awake, you who sleep, arise from the dead, and Christ will give you light.”  15See then that you walk circumspectly, not as fools but as wise, 16redeeming the time, because the days are evil.” (Eph.5:8-15). 

 

This then is the difference between children of God and children of the Devil, children of light and children of darkness, each being made in the image of their father.  The first are heading towards a glorious eternal future, while the second towards an inglorious eternal darkness and damnation.

 

10“When Jesus heard it, He marvelled, and said to those who followed, “Assuredly, I say to you, I have not found such great faith, not even in Israel11And I say to you that many will come from east and west, and sit down with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven. 12But the sons of the kingdom will be cast out into outer darkness. There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”  (Mat. 8:10-12).

 

11“But when the king came in to see the guests, he saw a man there who did not have on a wedding garment. 12So he said to him, ‘Friend, how did you come in here without a wedding garment?’ And he was speechless. 13Then the king said to the servants, ‘Bind him hand and foot,  take him away, and cast him into outer darkness; there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’  14“For many are called, but few are chosen.” (Mat.22:11-14).

      

So, did Jesus Christ change the Law of God regarding capital punishment? To do so would have meant to put murderers and their victims on an equal footing.  But God says that murderers are not made in his image, and can never have a place in His Kingdom?  This is why the Scriptures say: “Whoever sheds man’s blood, by man his blood shall be shed; For in the image of God He made man.”  It was so in the Old Testament, it is so in the New Testament, it will be so in the Millennium Kingdom, and it will be so forever more in the Kingdom of God.  The law regarding capital punishment – the sixth Commandment – could never be abolished, because that law preserves the sacredness of life, and it shall do so forever more. It anyone tells you otherwise, he does not speak according to the Word of God.   

Another argument that is often brought into this discussion is that innocent people may loose their life.  Well, if anyone ever loses his life innocently, happy is that man.  He had assured himself of eternal life in the Kingdom of God.   

The truth is that there is another sinister reason why Catholic and other Churches are pushing for the abolition of the death penalty.  Imagine what would have happened if such was the law at the time of Jesus Christ.  You would have no Saviour now. Had the Devil and his servants known that they were digging their own graves, they would not have killed Him.  Now they do not want to be trapped doing the same mistake, for they know that before the return of Jesus Christ, God’s last two witnesses must also be killed.  Here is their story.   

 

 3“And I will give power to my two witnesses, and they will prophesy one thousand two hundred and sixty days, clothed in sackcloth.”

4These are the two olive trees and the two lampstands standing before the God of the earth. 5And if anyone wants to harm them, fire proceeds from their mouth and devours their enemies. And if anyone wants to harm them, he must be killed in this manner. 6These have power to shut heaven, so that no rain falls in the days of their prophecy; and they have power over waters to turn them to blood, and to strike the earth with all plagues, as often as they desire.

7When they finish their testimony, the beast that ascends out of the bottomless pit will make war against them, overcome them, and kill them. 8And their dead bodies will lie in the street of the great city which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified. 9Then those from the peoples, tribes, tongues, and nations £will see their dead bodies three-and-a-half days, and not allow their dead bodies to be put into graves. 10And those who dwell on the earth will rejoice over them, make merry, and send gifts to one another, because these two prophets tormented those who dwell on the earth.

11Now after the three-and-a-half days the breath of life from God entered them, and they stood on their feet, and great fear fell on those who saw them. 12And they heard a loud voice from heaven saying to them, “Come up here.” And they ascended to heaven in a cloud, and their enemies saw them. 13In the same hour there was a great earthquake, and a tenth of the city fell. In the earthquake seven thousand people were killed, and the rest were afraid and gave glory to the God of heaven.” (Rev.11:3-13).

 

Those who push for the abolition of the death penalty want to change the course of history.  They know that Jesus Christ cannot return until all biblical prophecies are fulfilled.  They also know that when He returns, it will be the end of their reign upon this world.  Only a blind person would not see that the events associated with the two witnesses are obvious in our world today.

 

 

 

               The Sabbath a Point of Contention Once Again

 

Jesus Christ left no doubt which day He expects to find His followers observing when He returns to this earth.  This is what He told them when they asked Him about it.  

 

15“Therefore when you see the ‘abomination of desolation,’ spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place” (whoever reads, let him understand), 16“then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. 17Let him who is on the housetop not go down to take anything out of his house. 18And let him who is in the field not go back to get his clothes. 19But woe to those who are pregnant and to those who are nursing babies in those days! 20And pray that your flight may not be in winter or on the Sabbath21For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until this time, no, nor ever shall be. 22And unless those days were shortened, no flesh would be saved; but for the elect’s sake those days will be shortened.” (Mat. 24:15-22)

 

The reason they must pray that their flight from the Great Tribulation should not occur on the Sabbath is because that is a day of rest and worship, and they are not allowed to carry heavy burdens on that day. 

Amazingly, Sabbath observing people are once again embroiled in a fierce debate on how to observe this day.     

Two years ago, we received the following email from a congregation that simply signs itself as ‘Blow the Trumpet’ 

 

“Dear friends, For nearly two years Blow the Trumpet has pressed God's Church to seriously address the issue of His people dining out on the Sabbath. For the most part leaders have attempted to dismiss this topic as unimportant as well as divisive. Some groups have even directed their members to refrain from discussing it altogether and have actually warned them that failure to conform to the church's position could result in expulsion.  Blow the Trumpet has written extensively on this subject and continues to receive words of encouragement from scores of members who have humbly sought God's wisdom on this critical end time issue. We invite their comments and will always respond. 

Recently we have received numerous requests to respond to a paper written by the United Church of God, defending this practice. We have done so in a series of articles that can be accessed by clicking the following link: http://blowthetrumpet.org/TheUnitedChurchofGodvsASabbathTest.htm .   Respectfully, “Blow the Trumpet.”

 

We did not reply to this email and paid no further attention to it.  We do not enter into discussion with people who write anonymously, or who hide behind epithets or some other subterfuges.  Last year, they sent us this email again. 

Now you would think that since they had received “encouragement from scores of members who have humbly sought God’s wisdom on this critical end time issue”, they would have enough to settle this question once and for all, but no, they still want our opinion.  Well, we will give it to them; we just hope they will like it.  

The easiest way to settle this question would be to go to the Jews for to them were given the ‘oracles’ of God, as Apostle Paul called the laws, judgments and statutes that God gave to Moses. 

 

1What advantage then has the Jew, or what is the profit of circumcision? 2Much in every way! Chiefly because to them were committed the oracles of God. 3For what if some did not believe? Will their unbelief make the faithfulness of God without effect? 4Certainly not! Indeed, let God be true but every man a liar.” (Rom. 3:1-4)

 

The apostles and the early Churches of God had no doubt which was the correct day of rest and worship, or how to observe it.