WISDOM OF THE WORLD

             VERSUS
THE WISDOM OF GOD
 
A few years ago, I saw a documentary program about the Dead Sea Scrolls that left me completely uninterested in the subject. The main speaker, a female theologian, made a strong case that the Qumran community, which produced those documents, was a Gnostic congregation that believed in salvation through knowledge – and secret knowledge at that. 

Now for those of us who believe that salvation is a matter of faith and grace from God, it placed that program outside our area of interest.  For no one who believes in salvation through knowledge can be taken seriously as far as the Gospel of Jesus Christ is concerned.

“For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast” (Eph. 2:8-9).

Gaining salvation through knowledge would shift the focus from God to the individual, and from grace to works. The more knowledgeable one would become, the more merit he would acquire, and the surer he would be of salvation. Thus, the wise of this world, the wealthy, the high fliers, the inheritors of titles and positions, would be in a good position to ensure for themselves a nice place in the Kingdom of Heaven. The Bible, however, is telling us a different story.     

 

1 Cor 1:26  For you see your calling, brethren, that not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble,

1 Cor 1:27  are called.   But God has chosen the foolish things of the world to put to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to put to shame the things which are mighty; and the base things of the

1 Cor 1:28  world and the things which are despised God has chosen, and the things which are not,

1 Cor 1:29  to bring to nothing the things that are, that no flesh should glory in His presence.

 

Acts 3:17 "Yet now, brethren, I know that you did it [crucified Christ], in ignorance as did also your rulers.  But those things which God foretold by the mouth of all His prophets,

Acts 3:18  that the Christ would suffer, He has thus fulfilled.  Repent  therefore and be converted,

Acts 3:19  that your sins may be blotted out, so that times of refreshing may come from the presence

Acts 3:20  of the Lord, and that He may send Jesus Christ, who was preached to you before, whom heaven must receive until the

Acts 3:21  times of restoration of all things, which God has spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began.

 

Luke 24:19  And He said to them, "What things?" So they said to Him, "The things concerning Jesus of Nazareth, who was a Prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people, and how the chief

Luke 24:20 priests and our rulers delivered Him to be condemned to death, and crucified Him.

 

John 7:46  The officers answered, "No man ever spoke like this Man!"

John 7:47  Then the Pharisees answered them, "Are you also deceived?

John 7:48  "Have any of the rulers or the Pharisees believed in Him?

John 7:49  "But this crowd that does not know the law is accursed."

John 12:42  Nevertheless even among the rulers many believed in Him, but because of the Pharisees they did not confess Him,

John 12:43  lest they should be put out of the synagogue; for they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God.

 

So, when it came to the most important decision of their life, the wise of this world, the rulers, the Pharisees, the priests, failed abysmally. They claimed that they knew the law, yet they killed the Prince of life contrary to the law.  Even those who believed in Him refused to confess Him before the people, lest they should be put out of the synagogue: “for they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God”.   If you think that this was a problem peculiar to the Pharisees of Jesus’ time, you do not know what has been happening in the world ever since.  How many wise, how many academics, how many rulers, confess Jesus Christ before the people today? We know of none. That is, we know of none who confess the Christ of the Gospels, for there are some who confess a christ which is foreign to the Scriptures.

If an academic were to confess Jesus Christ in one of their forums today, and said that he believed in God and in His word, the Bible, he would be ostracized from their midst and never asked to speak before them again.  He would most likely loose his job too, for universities have no room for those who confess God in their midst. 

Tertiary institutions – universities, colleges, seminars, institutes of higher studies – are supposed to be the repositories knowledge in our time, yet they treat with derision and contempt the very source that would grant them the wisdom of God, the one and only wisdom worth striving for.   Jesus Christ, the disciples, the prophets, gained that wisdom by obeying God and by meditating on His law.  Such is the nature of God’s law, that it imparts wisdom to those who mediate on it and seek to understand it.   

 

Psa 119:97  Oh, how I love Your law! It is my meditation all the day.

Psa 119:98  You, through Your commandments, make me wiser than my enemies; For they are

Psa 119:99  ever with me.  I have more understanding than all my teachers, For Your testimonies are

Psa 119:100  my meditation.  I understand more than the ancients, Because I keep Your precepts.

Psa 119:101  I have restrained my feet from every evil way, That I may keep Your word.

Psa 119:102  I have not departed from Your judgments, For You Yourself have taught me.

 

Yes, God personally teaches those who keep His commandments and are receptive to His wisdom.  He makes them wiser than their enemies, and wiser than their teachers.  The Pharisees of Jesus time wondered how He acquired such wisdom and authority when He had not been one of their pupils and never attended any of their rabbinical colleges.

 

Mat 7:28  And so it was, when Jesus had ended these sayings, that the people were astonished

Mat 7:29  at His teaching, for He taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes.

Mat 21:23  Now when He came into the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people confronted Him as He was teaching, and said, "By what authority are You doing these things? And who gave You this authority?"

 

Instead of inquiring how they too might acquire that kind of wisdom and authority, they were angry that they had been bypassed in the process.  Later, they had a similar problem with the Apostles.

 

Acts 4:13  Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were uneducated and untrained men, they marveled. And they realized that they had been with Jesus.

Acts 4:14  And seeing the man who had been healed standing with them, they could say nothing against it. 

Acts 4:15  But when they had commanded them to go aside out of the council, they conferred among themselves, saying,

Acts 4:16  "What shall we do to these men? For, indeed, that a notable miracle has been done through them is evident to all who dwell in Jerusalem, and we cannot deny it. 

Acts 4:17  "But so that it spreads no further among the people, let us severely threaten them, that from now on they speak to no

Acts 4:18   man in this name.” And they called them and commanded them not to speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus. 

Acts 4:19  But Peter and John answered and said to them, "Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you more than to

Acts 4:20  God, you judge.   "For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard."

 

Now how did these “uneducated and untrained men” gain such power and wisdom? They gained it through the Holy Spirit.  And why is no one receiving this power and wisdom today? Because they don’t seek it the right way, don’t believe in the Holy Spirit, and don’t meditate on God’s law anymore. 

Jesus Christ said: "I must work the works of Him who sent Me while it is day; the night is coming when no one can work” (John 9:4).  This is that night. This is the darkest spiritual hour in all of human history. Yet judging by the number of religious books and programs that are available today, one could easily think that we live in the greatest spiritual age ever.  A spiritual age it is indeed, but by the wrong spirit.

 

 

 

 

             JUSTICE FOR ALL,

EQUITY FOR NONE

 

Seven years ago we wrote:

 

“Human beings have an uncanny ability to discuss things when they get to a crisis point, then leave the problems to others to resolve.  This time, however, the problems will not be resolved by others.  The world is no longer facing temporary local problems, but intractable worldwide problems.  It is no longer a question of survival, but one of salvation.  But science cannot save; only God can.

Human beings, however, have decided that there is no room for God in their deliberations.  Even when the world is crumbling around them, when it is becoming obvious that life itself is in danger of extinction, they will not turn to the only source that can save them.  They seek immortality through "scientific" methods such as cryogenics (deep-­freezing of the corpse in the hope that one day scientists will discover the secret of immortality, cure their diseased bodies and revive them to eternal life), and perpetual replacement of body parts with robotic devises or genetically cloned body parts.  That is the kind of immortality science offers humanity.

That educated people can come up with such absurdities is a witness to the bankruptcy of our educational system.  That is the effect of compartmentalizing our tertiary studies in rigid disciplines without any relation to each other.  It should be obligatory for all university students to study humanity subjects.  As it is, we get medical graduates without ethics, lawyers without morals, and scientists with distorted visions of the future.  They need to study not just any humanity subjects, but the good old fashion classics, philosophy, and religion. 

During my University studies, the head of the Religious Studies Department once said that "time was when in philosophical studies people talked about God and the meaning of life, about ethics and values, but no more." These days they have a "Theory" that if people understand what they study, it is not worth studying.   Searching for truth, God, and a moral purpose in life does not go well with evolutionary thinking.  In the struggle for survival there is no room for compassion, altruistic feelings and transcendental goals.  Hedonistic materialism and the pursuit of mindless pleasures are the things that count in our "enlightened" society.  That is why humanity finds itself on the brink of catastrophe.” (The Christian Herald No 3, p. 4)

 

Have things changed since then?  Surprisingly, the one institution that we thought would be immune to such suggestions, given its history and pedigree, the University of Sydney, has indeed taken this path.  A prerequisite for their medical students now is a degree in humanity subjects.  Now they need to do the same with their law students.  But that may be easier said than done, for lawyers and humanity may prove to be a contradiction in terms. 

Three years ago, my wife of fourteen years said that she could no longer cope with the demands of this work and wanted a divorce.  The Jewish side of her family, who never quite came to terms with the fact that I was preaching Christ, prevailed over her in the end.   So I was asked to go to court one day to settle the question of our property.   But about a month earlier, I received a court subpoena from her solicitors, demanding all documents, receipts, and writings, associated with this work, from the very beginning up to that time.  I did not understand why they needed everything, instead of just the documents pertaining to our finances, but I had no choice, I had to comply with their request for you cannot disobey a court order.  So I handed over to her solicitors five boxes of documents.  

I always assumed that the courts would settle the question of property on the basis of each one’s contribution, benefits from marriage, and future earnings potential. I had never been in a court before, and I did not know that in the adversarial system, which operates in this country, and much of the English speaking world, justice is not the main aim of the game, but determining winners and losers. Once you begin a case, lawyers take over, and you become a pawn in their hands.  The problem is, their aims seem to be completely different from yours.  They have no notion of fairness or respect for the other person’s dignity. Their only concern is to win at all costs.  That’s how they get a reputation for themselves.        

I went to court alone, believing that the judge would be able to deliver a fair verdict based of the facts before him. Instead, he ignored much of what I said, and paid much attention to what my wife’s high powered legal team said.  For my wife, who herself was a lawyer, brought along another solicitor and a barrister.  Obviously she knew something about the justice system which I didn’t.  For two whole days they grilled me on just about everything they could think of.  They wanted to know what were my beliefs, what I wanted to achieve, what was the purpose of this work, why I wrote what I wrote, and dozens of similar questions.  When they finally got to our finances, they could not believe that in seven years our donations amounted to less than a hundred dollars.

I tried to explain to them that everything we did was for free, that we never requested contributions from anyone, that we followed the Apostles of Jesus Christ who preached the Gospel for free, that this work was in fact prophesied to be done by poor people (people “clothed in sackcloth”, as the Scriptures put it), but the more I tried to explain these things to them the more incredulous they became.   They could not believe that after sending out thousands of letters and magazines over many years we received so little in reply. They concluded that I was not telling the truth and that I must have had secret bank accounts.   And so they sent out subpoena to the local banks asking them to provide details of all accounts in my name and the name of this Foundation.  When the results came in, and they found nothing, they concluded that I was mad. That suited them well, for then they could claim that I squandered money on a work of no value, and therefore my wife was entitled to much of what was left.  

The judge’s verdict was so outrageously skewed in her favor, it became obvious that the intent had little to do with equity and justice, and everything to do with bringing this work to an end. 

About a year earlier, I was pensioned off from my work as Teacher/Librarian after injuries received in a car accident six years earlier caught up with me and I was no longer able to stand up for hours in front of students.

With the money received as compensation from that accident, I immediately paid off the mortgage on our house.  Yet my wife, who was due to inherit a property worth in excess of a million dollars, whose salary was ten times the size of my pension, who could have purchased a bigger and better house in less than three years, was given the lion share of our house too.  During our marriage, I supported her while she obtained three university degrees. Yet none of that had any bearing on the judge’s final verdict.   

That decision forced me out of Sydney, for with the little that I received, and my meager pension, I could no longer live in that expensive city.  Then, unbelievably, about a month later, I was asked to go back to court. Her legal team had decided that I lost the case, and therefore I had to pay her expenses and legal fees too.  The judge, of course, agreed. 

Like Pilate, at the time of Jesus Christ, he knew that he was delivering an unjust verdict, but did not have the moral strength to stand up to his peers and say: “look, this is not right, what we are doing here is wrong, this is not justice but a mockery of it, so let’s do things right.”  Instead, he looked at me and said: “I am sorry to do this to you, Mr. Sbarcea”.  He understood how crooked and painful his decision would be, yet he still went ahead with it.  I then replied to him, “You are doing it to yourself, Sir”.

It took me two whole years before I recovered sufficiently to produce another edition of The Christian Herald.

But my case is not unique. About the same time, another famous case was doing the rounds in the media.  A woman had won a property settlement against her husband for the value of $500,000.  Then she received a bill from her solicitor for the amount of $480,000.  She took him to court and asked him to prove how he acquired such a bill. He couldn’t. He told the judge that he kept the expenses all in his mind.  You guessed it, he won the case, and she had to pay additional legal costs. 

Hardly a week passes by without the media highlighting more cases of gross miscarriage of justice. It is as if the judges have declared war on society and on decent citizens.  A huge front page headline titled, ROUGH JUSTICE, told the case of a shop owner who apprehended a thief and held him bound until the police arrived.  He was a repeated victim of this thief and his gang, yet the court charged the shop owner with assault and let the thief go free (The Daily Telegraph, August 8, 2000).  By contrast, three days earlier, a cookware company terminated a contract with a “flamboyant celebrity” after he breached the contract by “promoting products of a rival company, failing to appear at promotional shows, offending potential customers . . . and making vulgar remarks about the audience.”  The judge ordered the company to pay him $100,000 for breach of contract.  The man is a high profile homosexual.

Astonishingly, although everybody seems to know the truth about the justice system, no one can do anything about it.  A cartoon in a mass circulation newspaper, has a man lying on a bed in a doctor’s surgery. The doctor assesses him and says: “High IQ, no ethics, chronic liar. . . have you considered law?” (The Sun-Herald, July 20, 1997).  Another cartoon has two women talking in a waiting room.  A sign above them says, “How to recognize a psychopath in your workplace”.  One of them pointing furtively to a man behind them says: “Apparently he’s a corporate lawyer in his spare time” (SMH, August 8, 2000).   

Given such appalling reputation, you might think that universities would have a hard time filling quotas in their law faculties, when in fact the opposite is true.  Law schools are bursting at the seems, while education, humanities, and others, must lower their entrance marks in order to reach their numbers.

This profession is good at making money, but not so good at delivering justice. They are rich in the wisdom of the world, but extremely poor in the wisdom of God.  When I looked into the Scriptures, I was really surprised at what I found there about this profession.  God knew what would become of these people from the very beginning.  Here are some examples. 

 

Eccl 3:16  Moreover I saw under the sun: In the place of judgment, Wickedness was there;

Eccl 3:17 And in the place of righteousness, Iniquity was there.   I said in my heart, "God shall judge the righteous and the wicked, For there is a time there for every purpose and for every work."

 

Isa 59:4  No one calls for justice, Nor does any plead for truth. They trust in empty words and speak lies; They conceive evil and

Isa 59:5  bring forth iniquity.   They hatch vipers' eggs and weave the spider's web; He who eats of their eggs dies, And from that which is crushed a viper breaks out.

 

Luke 11:44  "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like graves which are not seen, and the men who walk over them are not aware of them.”  Then one of the lawyers answered and said to Him,

Luke 11:45  "Teacher, by saying these things You reproach us also.”

Luke 11:46  And He said, "Woe to you also, lawyers! For you load men with burdens hard to bear, and you yourselves do not touch the burdens with one of your fingers.

Luke 11:47  "Woe to you! For you build the tombs of the prophets, and your fathers killed them.

 

1 Cor 6:1  Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unrighteous, and not before

1 Cor 6:2  the saints?  Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world will be judged by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters?   Do you not know that we shall judge angels?

1 Cor 6:3  How much more, things that pertain to this life?

 

James 2:1  My brethren, do not hold the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with

James 2:2  partiality.  For if there should come into your assembly a man with gold rings, in fine apparel, and there should also come in a poor man in filthy clothes,  and you pay attention to the one

James 2:3  wearing the fine clothes and say to him, "You sit here in a good place," and say to the poor man, "You stand there," or, "Sit here at my footstool," have you not shown partiality

James 2:4  among yourselves, and become judges with evil thoughts?

James 2:5  Listen, my beloved brethren: Has God not chosen the poor of this world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom which He promised to those who love Him?

James 2:6  But you have dishonored the poor man. Do not the rich oppress you and drag you into the courts?

James 2:7  Do they not blaspheme that noble name by which you are called?

James 2:8  If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself," you

James 2:9  do well; but if you show partiality, you commit sin, and are convicted by the law as transgressors.

James 2:10  For whoever shall keep the whole law, and yet stumble in one point, he is guilty of all.

James 2:11  For He who said, "Do not commit adultery," also said, "Do not murder." Now if you do not commit adultery, but you do murder, you have become a transgressor of the law.

James 2:12  So speak and so do as those who will be judged by the law of liberty.  For judgment is

James 2:13   without mercy to the one who has shown no mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment.

 

But in the end, righteousness, truth and justice will prevail over the whole earth.

 

Zep 3:5  The LORD is righteous in her midst, He will do no unrighteousness. Every morning He brings His justice to light; He never fails, But the unjust knows no shame.

Isa 60:17  "Instead of bronze I will bring gold, Instead of iron I will bring silver, Instead of wood, bronze, And instead of stones, iron. I will also make your officers peace, And your magistrates righteousness.

Isa 61:8  "For I, the LORD, love justice; I hate robbery for burnt offering; I will direct their work in truth, And will make with them an everlasting covenant.   For as the earth brings forth its bud,

Isa 61:11  As the garden causes the things that are sown in it to spring forth, So the Lord GOD will cause righteousness and praise to spring forth before all the nations.

 

If you have a concordance, look under such terms as, justice, judges, rulers, priests, and the like, and see what you can find, for there is a lot more in the Bible about them.  This is what Jesus Christ thought about lawyers too.   

 

Luke 18:2  "There was in a certain city a judge who did not fear God nor regard man.

Luke 18:3  "Now there was a widow in that city; and she came to him, saying, 'Get justice for me from my

Luke 18:4  adversary.’ "And he would not for a while; but afterward he said within himself, 'Though I do not

Luke 18:5   fear God nor regard man, yet because this widow troubles me I will avenge her, lest by her continual coming she weary me.”  Then the Lord said, “Hear what the unjust judge said.

Luke 18:6  “And shall God not avenge His own elect who cry out day and night to Him,

Luke 18:7    though He bears long with them?  I tell you that He will avenge them speedily.

Luke 18:8   Nevertheless, when the Son of Man comes, will He really find faith on the earth?"

 

Jesus Christ knew that judges had no “fear of God, nor regard for man”. That is why He warned them: "with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you” (Mat 7:2).

Our current affair programs have reported several times that many of our country towns are in the grip of an unprecedented crime wave mostly by roving youth gangs of Aboriginal descent.  They terrorize the population, steal, break into houses in full daylight, even bash people in their own homes, yet when they are apprehended and brought before the courts many are let free because the level of proof required by the courts is almost impossible to achieve.  No one is more frustrated at this state of affairs than the police, who often put their life at risk to arrest these lawbreakers only to see the courts let them go free.  Too many are in custody, we are told, and so the judges find all sorts of excuses for not incarcerating any more.  They fear more bad publicity from that meddling institution called the United Nations.

 

“The Immigration Minister, Mr. Ruddock, forced to defend Australia’s record on Aborigines to a United Nations committee last month says it is ironic that the committee is headed by someone from the United States, which not only has mandatory sentencing but allows capital punishment of juveniles. . .   He defended the Government’s decision not to invite CERD committee members, including American lawyer Gay McDougal, into the country last year . . .   “That sort of examination might have been appropriate in countries  . . . where grave human rights abuses are occurring, but in the context of our situation the committee had already demonstrated an unwillingness to listen or read all the material put before it,” Mr Ruddock said” . . . The Government announced last week after the latest critical CERD report that it would institute a “whole-of-government review” on the operation of the UN treaty committee system, as it related to Australia.  The Prime Minister justified that decision yesterday by saying “UN committees have not behaved well – the [CERD] committee totally ignored what the Government put forward.”  (SMH, April 3, 2000).

 

Our Government would do well to come out of that institution altogether, and stop wasting money on it for its days are numbered.  Remember what they did six years ago?  This is what we wrote then. 

 

“The slide into the precipice has been accelerated by the recent decision of the United Nations to become the moral and spiritual policeman of the world.  Not in upholding God's law, but Satan's rule.

The case of the Tasmanian homosexual who took his case to the United Nations is well known. The UN Human Rights Committee demanded that the Tasmanian Government overturn its anti-gay provisions from its Criminal Code because they violated "basic human rights".

 

"'I am amazed that a UN human rights committee would consider it a basic human right that people should be able to commit sodomy,' said the Tasmanian Attorney-General, Mr Ron Cornish.

[But] a Melbourne University law lecturer who has been an adviser to the Tasmanian gays, Mr Wayne Morgan, said the UN findings on sexual orientation made it likely that other cases of discrimination on similar grounds from other countries would succeed."  (SMH,  April 12, 1994).

 

Of course! All that is needed is for the ground to be broken in one country and the floods of hell are opened everywhere.  People may well remember that the first public demonstrations by the "gay liberation movement" took place in New York in the early 1970's. Only two decades later this cancer is well established all over the world and upheld by many national, and now international, governing bodies.  In all major world centres, the most vocal and visible demonstrators are those demanding their "liberation":  "homosexual liberation", "feminist liberation", "lesbian liberation", "animal liberation", "paedophile liberation", "gluttony liberation" and now "transgender liberation".

The day the UN Human Rights Committee decided for homosexuality, the Australian public broadcasting network - the ABC - presented a lengthy panel discussion on the plight of the transvestite people ("transgenders", as they like to be called). They were complaining that the UN decision does nothing for them. Being free to do whatever they want in private is not enough. They want to be able to go out in public, tell people about their gender preferences, and be loved for it.  But when they do that, they say that they usually get bashed, and they wonder why? Now, they want the United Nations to do something for them too.  And, nice and obliging as those at the UN are, they will no doubt find a way to uphold the transgenders' "basic rights" too. (The Christian Herald No 4, p.2).  

 

No institution that takes as its role the imposition of Satan’s rule upon the world, can expect to survive very long.  God has not recorded the example of Sodom and Gomorrah in the Bible for nothing.

Now they take issue with mandatory sentencing laws.  Such laws operate in many countries of the world  the United States, Wales and Scotland, being only some of them – yet the United Nations has singled out Australia.  Why? Because certain radical elements from the Aboriginal community don’t like it.  They can no longer get away with a slap on the wrist for repeated crimes, but are locked up behind bars as they should.  These laws are not directed against Aboriginal people, but against all lawbreakers.  Interestingly enough, these laws are popular even in Aboriginal communities, who more often than not, suffer more at the hands of unruly people than the while people.   But these laws are not popular with United Nations. Why?  Well, would Satan like to see people living safely, peacefully and in harmony with each other?  He does his work through his servants, and anyone who thinks that homosexuality is good for people, and protects lawbreakers against the community of decent citizens, is his servant.  It may surprise people to know this, butt the mandatory sentencing laws – “three strikes and you are out” – are in fact based on Christian principles. 

 

Mat 18:15  "Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother.

Mat 18:16  "But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that 'by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’  “And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church.

Mat 18:17  But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector.

 

Titus 3:10  Reject a divisive man after the first and second admonition,

Titus 3:11  knowing that such a person is warped and sinning, being self-condemned.

 

In Islamic countries where the Sharia law is enforced they do not have “three strikes and you are out”, but one strike and you are out.  Even to the point of losing one’s head. But has the UN railed against that?  No! Instead it has taken Australia to task, a Christian country with a great democratic tradition.  As one might have expected, anything Christian is anathema to this organization.  By forcing homosexuality on the world, and taking the side of lawbreakers, the UN has revealed its true colors and the master it serves. A leading Aboriginal figure understood the true causes of his people’s problems, and delivered an astonishing lecture recently.  But would the UN leaders take note of this? We doubt it.

 

“Aboriginal leader Mr Noel Pearson has lashed out at much “progressive” thinking on Aboriginal issues, saying it is destructive and compounding misery.  He attacked treating substance abuse as a symptom of disadvantage, and said high levels of Aboriginal incarceration require the restoration of social order and law enforcement rather than just legal aid.  Mr Pearson said the indigenous experience of the welfare state has been “disastrous”.  “A rule of thumb in relation to most of the programs and policies that pose as progressive thinking in indigenous affairs is that if we did the opposite we would have the chance of making progress,” he said.

Delivering the “Light of the Hill” Ben Chifley Lecture in Bathurst at the weekend, Mr Pearson said people who wanted to be progressive today “are in objective fact regressive in their thinking.  This is especially and painfully obvious if you know the situation in the Aboriginal communities of this country.”   “Petrol sniffing is in some places now so endemic that crying infants are silenced with petrol drenched rags on their faces.  In one of our communities in Cape York, among the less than 1,000 people there were three murders within one month a few months ago. And we don’t know what to do.

“Progressive” thinking about substance abuse, such as alcoholism, held it was “only a symptom of underlying social and psychological problems”. “But addiction is a condition in its own right, not a symptom. It must therefore be addressed as a problem in itself.”    The “symptom theory” absolved people from their responsibility to deal with addiction.  “Worse, it leaves communities to think that nothing can be done to confront substance abuse because of its purported causes: dispossession, racism, trauma and poverty, are beyond reach of social resolution at present.”   The “progressive” response to the level of Aboriginal jailings had been to provide legal aid.  “This progressive response – providing legal aid support services – has not worked . . .  In fact Aboriginal legal aid is part of the criminal justice industry . . .  It is like a sausage machine, and human lives are processed through it with no real belief that the statistics will ever be overcome.  The truth is . . .  the real need is for the restoration of social order and the enforcement of law.”   On welfare, he advocated its reform, not its abolition.  A new consensus was needed about welfare built on the principles of personal and family empowerment and investment and the use of resources to achieve change.  Our motivation to reform welfare must be based on the principle that dependency and passivity are a scourge and must be avoided at all costs. Dependency and passivity kills people and is surest road to social decline. Australians do not have an inalienable right to dependency; they have an inalienable right to a fair place in the real economy”(SMH, Aug.16, 2000).

          

This lecture is almost like the sermon of a good Christian.  His forthrightness and courage in delivering such a speech in the current environment can only be applauded.  Mr. Pearson understood that the current situation in which justice is being administered with regard to  “underlying social and psychological problems” does not lead to harmonious relationships between Aborigines and white people. Decent and honest citizens, whites and Aborigines alike, have little incentive to obey the law when they see that lawbreakers go free and justice is being delivered with partiality. Communities suffer when criminals go unpunished.  As Mr. Pearson noticed, the justice system is now part of the problem rather than offering solutions to it.  Yes, the justice system and the United Nations are now two good bedfellows.  Few people realize that the current social problems in Australia and around the world are a reflection of the prophecies spoken by Jesus Christ for our time.    

 

Mat 24:12  "And because lawlessness will abound, the love of many will grow cold.

Mat 24:13  "But he who endures to the end shall be saved.

 

Yes, because lawlessness abounds most people have become insensitive to what is happening around them.  But that is something Christians cannot afford to indulge in. They cannot despair, cannot allow their love to grow cold, and cannot lose faith in God’s ultimate judgment.  We must endure to the end if we want to be saved.  For God does take note of what is happening in the world at present, as He has always done. 

 

Mal 3:14  You have said, 'It is useless to serve God; What profit is it that we have kept His ordinance, And that we have walked as mourners before the LORD of hosts? 

Mal 3:15  So now we call the proud blessed, for those who do wickedness are raised up; They even tempt God and go free.”

Mal 3:16  Then those who feared the LORD spoke to one another, and the LORD listened and heard them; So a book of remembrance was written before Him for those who fear the LORD and who meditate on His name.

Mal 3:17  "They shall be Mine," says the LORD of hosts, "On the day that I make them My jewels. And I will spare them as a man spares his own son who serves him." Then you shall again discern between the righteous

Mal 3:18  and the wicked, between one who serves God and one who does not serve Him.

Mal 4:1  "For behold, the day is coming, burning like an oven, and all the proud, yes, all who do wickedly will be stubble. And the day which is coming shall burn them up," Says the LORD of hosts, "That will leave them neither root nor branch. 

Mal 4:2  But to you who fear My name the Sun of Righteousness shall arise with healing in His wings; And you shall go out and grow fat like stall-fed calves.  You shall trample the wicked, 

Mal 4:3  for they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet on the day that I do this," says the LORD of hosts.”  

 

 

 

 

 

 

HYPOCRISY IN HIGH PLACES

 

At the end of my court case, I went before the Almighty, as I often do, in supplication and worship, asking Him whether I should appeal to the High Court, believing that I had a good case of getting a better result there.  But the Almighty answered that I should get back to the Scriptures and not even think of going before their courts again. So I went back to the Scriptures and, as usual, I received yet more revelations. The day they sent me their court subpoena, was exactly seven years since I mailed out the first edition of The Christian Herald  to the world (that is, three and a half years by two).  The prophecies of Daniel 12, follow those of Revelation 11, and that is why the prophecies of Matthew 24 did not quite follow the pattern we expected.

If you do not know which prophecies we are talking about, or how to look at them, wait for our next edition when we will write about them in detail.  What is important to know now is that the world has been granted a few more years in which it could mend its ways and draw closer to God or be plunged into the greatest tribulation ever. It cannot afford to waste this opportunity for there will be no other chance.  

Humanity has simply not learned the lessons of the past. Two of the most important lessons recorded in the Bible for posterity were in relation to the abominable practice of homosexuality. The case of Sodom and Gomorrah is well known to the world, but what is not so well known is the case of the Israelite tribe of Benjamin. It is a fairly long story, but very instructive for the time in which we live.

 

Judg 19:11  They were near Jebus, and the day was far spent; and the servant said to his master, "Come, please, and let us turn aside into this city of the Jebusites and lodge in it”. 

Judg 19:12  But his master said to him, "We will not turn aside here into a city of foreigners, who are not of the children of Israel;  we will go to Gibeah.”  So he sent to his servant,

Judg 19:13   "Come, let us draw near to one of these places, and spend the night in Gibeah or in Ramah.”

Judg 19:14   And they passed by and went their way; and the sun went down on them near Gibeah, which belongs to Benjamin. 

Judg 19:15  They turned aside there to go in to lodge in Gibeah. And when he went in, he sat down in the open square of the city, for no one would take them into his house to spend the night. Just then an old man came in from his work in the field at evening,

Judg 19:16  who also was from the mountains of Ephraim; he was staying in Gibeah, whereas the men of the place were

Judg 19:17  Benjamites.   And when he raised his eyes, he saw the traveler in the open square of the city; and the old man said, "Where are you going, and where do you come from?"  So he said to him, “We are  passing from Bethlehem in Judah toward the

Judg 19:18  remote mountains of Ephraim; I am from there. I went to Bethlehem in Judah; now I am going to the house of the LORD. But there is no one who will take me into his house, although we have both straw and fodder for our donkeys, and bread

Judg 19:19  and wine for myself, for your female servant, and for the young man who is with your servant; there is no lack of anything."  And the old man said,

Judg 19:20  "Peace be with you! However, let all your needs be my responsibility; only do not spend the  night the open square.”

Judg 19:21  So he brought him into his house, and gave fodder to the donkeys. And they washed their feet, and ate and drunk. 

Judg 19:22  As they were enjoying themselves, suddenly certain men of the city, perverted men, surrounded the house and beat on the door. They spoke to the master of the house, the old man, saying, "Bring out the man who came to your house, that we may

Judg 19:23  know him carnally!"  But the man, the master of the house, went out to them and said to them, "No, my brethren! I beg you, do not act so wickedly! Seeing this man has come into my house, do not commit this outrage.

Judg 19:24  "Look, here is my virgin daughter and the man's concubine; let me bring them out now. Humble them, and do with them as you please; but to this man do not do such a vile thing!"

Judg 19:25  But the men would not heed him. So the man took his concubine and brought her out to them. And they knew her and abused her all night until morning; and when the day began to break, they let her go.  Then the woman came

Judg 19:26   as the day was dawning, and fell down at the door of the man's house where her master was, till it was light. 

Judg 19:27  When her master arose in the morning, and opened the doors of the house and went out to go his way, there was his concubine, fallen at the door of the house with her hands on the threshold.   And he said to her,

Judg 19:28  "Get up and let us be going." But there was no answer. So the man lifted her onto the donkey; and the man got up

Judg 19:29